From: Holger Freyther <holger+bitbake@freyther.de>
To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] codeparser: accept a name for better messages
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:05:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EABA59F.5040204@freyther.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANm4C9_xcYCcjZHXx2PKTQy12cH=3c0ukgCjcRFji_3+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/29/2011 04:00 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> Note: applies on top of the previous series. Does this message wording
> seem sane to people, or would you prefer it remain more like the
> previous one? I rather like the new sentence form. Also, 'Warning'
> could unnecessarily scare users looking back at logs.
looks sane.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-29 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-29 1:57 [PATCH] codeparser: accept a name for better messages Christopher Larson
2011-10-29 2:00 ` Chris Larson
2011-10-29 7:05 ` Holger Freyther [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EABA59F.5040204@freyther.de \
--to=holger+bitbake@freyther.de \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox