From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgjQm-0001Ym-6O for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:24:16 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5ILDWQf010654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msp-dhcp56.wrs.com (172.25.34.56) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:13:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4FDF99FB.2030503@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:13:31 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: is there a bitbake command to *just* fetch all necessary packages? X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:24:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/18/12 4:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >> perhaps i'm just misreading the docs, but is there a bitbake >> incantation that does *nothing* more than fetch the packages needed >> for a target image? >> >> if i use "bitbake -c fetchall", the result is not just to fetch the >> source, but to unload and patch it as well. > > hmmm I thought it did just what it says 'fetch all' but as you say it > seems to do more hmm I am not sure if its intended behavior In order for fetchall to work, there are a few dependencies that have to be executed as well.. But bitbake -c fetchall , will fetch everything needed for the recipe. It will extract and build only the items necessary for fetch to work properly. --Mark > i don't want that, i want >> whatever the magic is to just *fetch* and leave it at that. or is >> that simply not possible? >> >> rday >> >> -- >> >> ======================================================================== >> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA >> http://crashcourse.ca >> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday >> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday >> ======================================================================== >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bitbake-devel mailing list >> bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel > _______________________________________________ > bitbake-devel mailing list > bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel