From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43296DAF8 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2B8MZjW003789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 01:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.226] (128.224.162.226) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 01:22:34 -0700 Message-ID: <531EC7C9.7040209@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:22:33 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Javier Viguera References: <991B6481567A894BA8E18E29D118D85801558DEB1EF4@dor-sms-exch01.digi.com> <53106DFA.6030308@digi.com> In-Reply-To: <53106DFA.6030308@digi.com> Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" , "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [poky] [for-dora] backport bitbake git fetcher fix X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:22:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Javier, Thanks for reporting this, I will backport it to dora, sorry for the late reponse. Btw. this email should go into bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org // Robert On 02/28/2014 07:07 PM, Javier Viguera wrote: > Hi all, > > Seems that this didn't catch much attention. Maybe because this is not the > correct list for bitbake fixes. > > I had a look at bitbake git repo and they did not follow the branching scheme in > openembedded/poky. So where do i need to send a fix for bitbake that i need to > be included in already-released poky Dora? > > - > Javier Viguera > Software Engineer > Digi International® Spain S.A.U. > > > > On 21/02/14 17:54, Viguera, Javier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm using Dora with a customer kernel that happens to have two very >> similar branch names: >> >> af186b498eb8e39ffa419d356010d67d7fa6dee3 refs/heads/android/v3.10/master >> a094f655dc2ba623742a01dcb744ed0e8ebde3ed refs/heads/v3.10/master >> >> My custom linux recipe does the following to get 'v3.10/master' branch: >> >> KBRANCH_DEFAULT = "v3.10/master" >> KBRANCH = "${KBRANCH_DEFAULT}" >> SRC_URI = "${GIT_URL}linux-2.6.git;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}" >> >> But it always fetchs the 'android/v3.10/master' branch. >> >> This seems to be already fixed in master: >> >> d21c1537b7052aa24ec56434b821fee67de33a83 >> >> So could that fix be cherry-picked to Dora? >> >> Directly cherry-picking the commit does not apply cleanly so i attach >> here a reworked patch that applies to Dora. >> >> - >> Javier Viguera >> Software Engineer >> Digi International® Spain S.A.U. >> > > _______________________________________________ > poky mailing list > poky@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky > >