From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CCA60425 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2014 05:25:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,553,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="563831191" Received: from linux.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.23.219.25]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2014 05:31:16 -0700 Received: from [10.254.114.187] (unknown [10.254.114.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55846A4007 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53AC1290.8000302@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:31:12 -0700 From: "Rifenbark, Scott M" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: couple observations on sync'ing up bitbake user manual and git.py fetcher X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:31:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/19/2014 11:03 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > short observations someone higher up the food chain is welcome to > resolve: > > in this section: > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual.html#git-fetcher > > explanation of "tag" parameter refers to "revision" parameter, should > be just "rev" parameter, no? Correct.. I fixed this in the documentation. > > and in git.py fetcher file itself, in the early self-contained > documemntation, there is no mention of any of the "rev", "subpath" or > "destsuffix" parameters. > > that's it for now. > > rday >