From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SzqOE-0007Om-SZ for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:40:39 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2012 07:28:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,745,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="184318254" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.78]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2012 07:28:47 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Robert Yang Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: <9608773.T2XBm9ArBe@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9 (Linux/3.2.0-27-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1 V2] bitbake-whatchanged: print what is about to happen X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:40:39 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 10 August 2012 11:47:38 Robert Yang wrote: > Changes of V2: > > * Fix a typo fn -> 'fn' > > * Use "bitbake -e" rather than "bitbake -e recipe" to get the BB_STAMPS_DIR > > * Use "BB_STAMPS_DIR= bitbake -S recipe" to regenerate the stamps > > * Change the summary format a little, now it looks like: > - (without -v): > === Summary: (3653 changed, 1927 unchanged) > Newly added: 807 > PV changed: 48 > PR changed: 276 > Depends changed: 2522 > > - (with -v): > === Summary: (3653 changed, 1927 unchanged) > Newly added: 807 > Depends changed: 2846 > > // Robert > > The following changes since commit 2dec760b79bb7e2e79c33c5127fa64685bd86a18: > > foomatic: fix perl path for target (2012-08-08 10:06:00 +0100) So leaving Chris's objections aside for a moment, I applied this and the BB_STAMPS_DIR change, and ran the script on my build directory which is out of date with respect to the metadata (i.e. metadata has been updated since the last build). The output seems to suggest that no changes have been made, which is not the case: ----------- snip ----------- $ bitbake-whatchanged core-image-minimal Figuring out the BB_STAMPS_DIR ... Generating the new stamps ... (need several minutes) === Summary: (0 changed, 0 unchanged) Newly added: 0 PV changed: 0 PR changed: 0 Depends changed: 0 ----------- snip ----------- Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre