Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org"
	<bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: RE: [bitbake-devel] [PATCH 2/3] knotty.py: Give the setscene tasks their own progress bar
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:00:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af45542e292645da9c79cbc5f2d05793@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ce6730badc71ed1d136bf14044a23c038efaf17.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: den 7 mars 2022 16:48
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>; bitbake-
> devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [bitbake-devel] [PATCH 2/3] knotty.py: Give the setscene
> tasks their own progress bar
> 
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 14:36 +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> > From: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
> >
> > In commit 8055ec36 (knotty: Improve setscene task display) the setscene
> > tasks got their own line in the task output. However, the progress bar
> > code does not handle newlines in its widgets, so the length of the
> > setscene line was included when calculating how much space is available
> > for the progress bar of the running tasks, making it much too short.
> >
> > Instead of trying to teach the progress bar code to handle newlines,
> > give the setscene tasks their own progress bar.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
> > ---
> >  bitbake/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> I'd much prefer not to add yet another confusing progress bar as it will
> just confuse users more. The real progress to watch is the real tasks 
> one and that will increase as setscene tasks are covered.

Hmm, my first solution was without the progress bar. However, when 
I realized that a progress bar could be used instead, I thought it 
made sense.

Consider the case where you are making a build which has almost 
everything in the sstate cache, then the current output is less 
optimal. I.e., the first line will show a counter increasing, but 
no progress bar, while the second line shows a progress bar that 
basically goes from 0% to 100% in one step once all the setscene 
tasks are done.

> Adding this draws the user's attention away from where they probably want
> to be looking. If you know otherwise, you don't need the progress bar IMO.

Need is a strong word when it comes to the progress bars. Personally 
I like to watch them move along. :) I find it easier to get a view 
of the current progress by looking at the bars rather than the 
corresponding numbers.

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard

//Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 13:36 [PATCH 1/3] knotty.py: Improve the message while waiting for running tasks to finish Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-03-07 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] knotty.py: Give the setscene tasks their own progress bar Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-03-07 15:48   ` [bitbake-devel] " Richard Purdie
2022-03-07 16:00     ` Peter Kjellerstedt [this message]
2022-03-07 13:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] knotty.py: Separate the display of main tasks from running tasks Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-03-07 15:46   ` [bitbake-devel] " Richard Purdie
2022-03-07 16:01     ` Peter Kjellerstedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af45542e292645da9c79cbc5f2d05793@axis.com \
    --to=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox