From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Christopher Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Cc: BitBake developer list <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG]
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:55:23 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANn_x7Y9XJ-g861+9YEsXtVNwF-krtf7QBgrG50PxUdEPw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2052 bytes --]
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> (note: more annoying pedantry regarding bitbake configuration and
> documentation but, if i'm going to explain this to my students, i
> really need to understand it completely.)
>
> some questions and observations about how bitbake defines some
> fetch-related variables as opposed to how those variables are defined
> in higher layers such as oe-core and poky. as richard purdie(?)
> pointed out recently, the goal should be to document bitbake as
> independently as possible from what happens in layers such as oe and
> poky, but it seems this is not as clean as it could be.
>
> consider first bitbake's current bitbake.conf file. first, can we
> agree that this set of variables:
>
>
> Before I dive into the remainder of the email, we should note that
> the bitbake.conf in bitbake is never used when you use oe, it's
> solely as an example / starting point for other non-oe projects
> wanting to use bitbake. Presumably it gets forgotten about when
> changes to bitbake itself are made, and so it's fallen behind.
oh, i realize that but (i think) my main point was that it seems
almost impossible to document bitbake completely stand-alone when
almost everyone is going to use it in the context of a higher layer
like OE, and there just seem to be unnecessary inconsistencies between
bitbake and OE that make the bitbake user manual confusing.
more in a bit ...
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 15:47 distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG] Robert P. J. Day
2014-06-20 15:54 ` Christopher Larson
2014-06-20 15:55 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-06-20 16:09 ` Christopher Larson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox