Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Christopher Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Cc: BitBake developer list <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG]
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:55:23 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANn_x7Y9XJ-g861+9YEsXtVNwF-krtf7QBgrG50PxUdEPw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2052 bytes --]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Christopher Larson wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>         (note: more annoying pedantry regarding bitbake configuration and
>       documentation but, if i'm going to explain this to my students, i
>       really need to understand it completely.)
>
>         some questions and observations about how bitbake defines some
>       fetch-related variables as opposed to how those variables are defined
>       in higher layers such as oe-core and poky. as richard purdie(?)
>       pointed out recently, the goal should be to document bitbake as
>       independently as possible from what happens in layers such as oe and
>       poky, but it seems this is not as clean as it could be.
>
>         consider first bitbake's current bitbake.conf file. first, can we
>       agree that this set of variables:
>
>
> Before I dive into the remainder of the email, we should note that
> the bitbake.conf in bitbake is never used when you use oe, it's
> solely as an example / starting point for other non-oe projects
> wanting to use bitbake. Presumably it gets forgotten about when
> changes to bitbake itself are made, and so it's fallen behind.

  oh, i realize that but (i think) my main point was that it seems
almost impossible to document bitbake completely stand-alone when
almost everyone is going to use it in the context of a higher layer
like OE, and there just seem to be unnecessary inconsistencies between
bitbake and OE that make the bitbake user manual confusing.

  more in a bit ...

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-20 15:47 distinguishing between bitbake and "higher" layers WRT fetching variables [LONG] Robert P. J. Day
2014-06-20 15:54 ` Christopher Larson
2014-06-20 15:55   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2014-06-20 16:09     ` Christopher Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.11.1406201152050.4233@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox