Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@windriver.com>
To: <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] data_smart.py (mostly): Variable and include tracking!
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:27:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1337361285.git.peter.seebach@windriver.com> (raw)

This is a first pass at allowing us to answer that vexing question:

Where the heck did that value come from?

The complexity of bitbake's variable assignment means that even if you
had a complete list of the lines being processed in order, you might need
a few tries to figure out why a variable is set to what it is.  When
debugging, you might want to know what it would have been otherwise,
too; knowing that a given ?= is processed after a +=, for instance,
could save you a great deal of trouble.  To solve this, we add two pieces
of functionality to "bitbake -e".

The first is a list of the .conf/.inc files that were parsed, in order;
the list shows included files indented under the thing that included
them, making it easier to see not just what got processed, but why it got
processed.

The second is a list of all the operations performed on each value, in
order, citing to the file and line number where they happened (whenever
possible).  So, for instance, say I want to know how SSTATETASKS got its
value.  The output of "bitbake -e" now says:

# SSTATETASKS [4]
#   append /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/staging.bbclass:105:
#     < do_populate_sysroot>
#   append /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1750:
#     < do_populate_sysroot do_package>
#   append /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass:1112:
#     < do_populate_sysroot do_package do_package_write_rpm>
#   append /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/license.bbclass:380:
#     < do_populate_sysroot do_package do_package_write_rpm do_populate_lic>
#
# SSTATETASKS= do_populate_sysroot do_package do_package_write_rpm do_populate_lic

Wait, staging.bbclass?  I don't remember asking for that.  Let's go look
at the include history:

# /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/base.bbclass includes:
#   /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/patch.bbclass includes:
#     /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/terminal.bbclass
#   /home/seebs/poky/meta/classes/staging.bbclass

So this tells me that staging.bbclass was included from base.bbclass.  Yay!
Mystery is solved.  Everything is working because it's doing what it is
supposed to do.  :)

The following changes since commit f8bf4499549f978ce7c93bc088a66f74cd751e2c:
  Martin Jansa (1):
        setup.py: fix path for bitbake-selftest

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib seebs/tracking
  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=seebs/tracking

Peter Seebach (2):
  data_smart.py: Provide (optional) logging of variable modifications
  data_smart.py: Track configuration file inclusions

 lib/bb/cooker.py                   |    4 +-
 lib/bb/data.py                     |   46 +++++++++++--
 lib/bb/data_smart.py               |  128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 lib/bb/parse/__init__.py           |    8 ++-
 lib/bb/parse/ast.py                |   89 +++++++++++++------------
 lib/bb/parse/parse_py/BBHandler.py |    8 +-
 lib/bb/siggen.py                   |    2 +-
 7 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)




             reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 17:27 Peter Seebach [this message]
2012-05-18 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] data_smart.py: Provide (optional) logging of variable modifications Peter Seebach
2012-05-18 17:38   ` Peter Seebach
2012-05-18 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] data_smart.py: Track configuration file inclusions Peter Seebach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1337361285.git.peter.seebach@windriver.com \
    --to=peter.seebach@windriver.com \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox