BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: increase verifier log limit in veristat
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:34:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04056da1-a477-4dce-8466-04eef9428384@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxaE_C_Im9-I8OSa@krava>

On 21/10/2024 17:44, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:16:16PM +0100, Mykyta Yatsenko wrote:
>> From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
>>
>> The current default buffer size of 16MB allocated by veristat is no
>> longer sufficient to hold the verifier logs of some production BPF
>> programs. To address this issue, we need to increase the verifier log
>> limit.
>> Commit 7a9f5c65abcc ("bpf: increase verifier log limit") has already
>> increased the supported buffer size by the kernel, but veristat users
>> need to explicitly pass a log size argument to use the bigger log.
>>
>> This patch adds a function to detect the maximum verifier log size
>> supported by the kernel and uses that by default in veristat.
>> This ensures that veristat can handle larger verifier logs without
>> requiring users to manually specify the log size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.c
>> index c8efd44590d9..1d0708839f4b 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/veristat.c
>> @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
>>   #include <sys/stat.h>
>>   #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
>>   #include <bpf/btf.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
>>   #include <libelf.h>
>>   #include <gelf.h>
>>   #include <float.h>
>>   #include <math.h>
>> +#include <linux/filter.h>
>>   
>>   #ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
>>   #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
>> @@ -1109,6 +1111,42 @@ static void fixup_obj(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog, const ch
>>   	return;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int max_verifier_log_size(void)
>> +{
>> +	const int big_log_size = UINT_MAX >> 2;
>> +	const int small_log_size = UINT_MAX >> 8;
>> +	struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
>> +		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> +		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>> +	};
>> +	int ret, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
>> +	char *log_buf;
>> +	static int log_size;
>> +
>> +	if (log_size != 0)
>> +		return log_size;
>> +
>> +	log_size = small_log_size;
>> +	log_buf = malloc(big_log_size);
> IIUC this would try to use 1GB by default? seems to agresive.. could we perhaps
> do that gradually and double the size on each failed load attempt?
>
> jirka
Yes, this allocates 1GB by default, I expect this is not a big of a 
problem if verifier
does not touch all that memory.
I tried doing gradual allocation initially, but that requires more 
significant rework
of the code.
Thanks for looking into this patch!
>
>> +
>> +	if (!log_buf)
>> +		return log_size;
>> +
>> +	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
>> +		    .log_buf = log_buf,
>> +		    .log_size = big_log_size,
>> +		    .log_level = 2
>> +	);
>> +	ret = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, NULL, "GPL", insns, insn_cnt, &opts);
>> +	free(log_buf);
>> +
>> +	if (ret > 0) {
>> +		log_size = big_log_size;
>> +		close(ret);
>> +	}
>> +	return log_size;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int process_prog(const char *filename, struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog)
>>   {
>>   	const char *base_filename = basename(strdupa(filename));
>> @@ -1132,7 +1170,7 @@ static int process_prog(const char *filename, struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf
>>   	memset(stats, 0, sizeof(*stats));
>>   
>>   	if (env.verbose || env.top_src_lines > 0) {
>> -		buf_sz = env.log_size ? env.log_size : 16 * 1024 * 1024;
>> +		buf_sz = env.log_size ? env.log_size : max_verifier_log_size();
>>   		buf = malloc(buf_sz);
>>   		if (!buf)
>>   			return -ENOMEM;
>> -- 
>> 2.47.0
>>
>>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-21 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-21 14:16 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: increase verifier log limit in veristat Mykyta Yatsenko
2024-10-21 16:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-21 20:14   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-21 20:38     ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2024-10-21 20:44     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-10-21 20:34   ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04056da1-a477-4dce-8466-04eef9428384@gmail.com \
    --to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox