From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf, sockmap: fix use-after-free when the stream parser resizes the skb
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:45:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04931588-e708-40d8-a1b7-3700a1a3b376@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612123553.2724240-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
On 6/12/26 8:35 PM, Sechang Lim wrote:
> sk_psock_strp_parse() runs the BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB stream-parser program
> to find the length of the next message. strparser assembles a message out
> of several received skbs by chaining them onto the head's frag_list and
> recording where to append the next one in strp->skb_nextp:
>
> *strp->skb_nextp = skb;
> strp->skb_nextp = &skb->next;
>
> and then calls the parser on the head:
>
> len = (*strp->cb.parse_msg)(strp, head);
>
> The parser is only meant to inspect the skb, but the program may call
> bpf_skb_change_tail() -- or the sibling bpf_skb_pull_data(),
> bpf_skb_change_head(), bpf_skb_adjust_room(), all allowed for SK_SKB.
> Once the head carries a frag_list these go
>
> ... -> skb_ensure_writable -> pskb_may_pull -> __pskb_pull_tail
>
> and __pskb_pull_tail() frees the frag_list skbs that strparser still
> tracks through skb_nextp:
>
> while ((list = skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list) != insp) {
> skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = list->next;
> consume_skb(list);
> }
>
> strp->skb_nextp now points into a freed sk_buff. The next segment of
> the same message arrives in __strp_recv(), which links it with
> *strp->skb_nextp = skb, an 8-byte write into the freed skb. The free
> and the write happen in different __strp_recv() calls, so the message
> has to span at least three segments before it triggers.
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __strp_recv+0x447/0xda0
> Write of size 8 at addr ffff88810db86140 by task repro/349
>
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> __strp_recv+0x447/0xda0
> __tcp_read_sock+0x13d/0x590
> tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock+0x195/0x320
> strp_data_ready+0x267/0x340
> sk_psock_strp_data_ready+0x1ce/0x350
> tcp_data_queue+0x1364/0x2fd0
> tcp_rcv_established+0xe07/0x1640
> [...]
>
> Allocated by task 349:
> skb_clone+0x17b/0x210
> __strp_recv+0x2c3/0xda0
> __tcp_read_sock+0x13d/0x590
> [...]
>
> Freed by task 349:
> kmem_cache_free+0x150/0x570
> __pskb_pull_tail+0x57b/0xc20
> skb_ensure_writable+0x236/0x260
> __bpf_skb_change_tail+0x1d4/0x590
> sk_skb_change_tail+0x2a/0x40
> bpf_prog_1b285dcd6c41373e+0x27/0x30
> bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0xf3/0x260
> sk_psock_strp_parse+0x118/0x1e0
> __strp_recv+0x4f6/0xda0
> [...]
>
> The same resize also leaves the head's length inconsistent with its
> frags, so a later __pskb_pull_tail() can instead hit the
> BUG_ON(skb_copy_bits(...)) in net/core/skbuff.c.
>
> Run the parser on a private clone of the head when the message spans more
> than one skb and the program can modify the packet
> (prog->aux->changes_pkt_data), so a resizing helper can only touch the
> clone and strparser's head and skb_nextp stay valid. Single-skb messages
> have no frag_list and read-only parsers cannot resize, so both are still
> parsed in place. If the clone cannot be allocated, return 0 so the caller
> retries on the next read rather than failing the parser.
>
> Fixes: 8a31db561566 ("bpf: add access to sock fields and pkt data from sk_skb programs")
Please consider Kuniyuki Iwashima's suggestion.
But it only covers the ATTACH path; the other two paths should be
covered as well:
- BPF_PROG_ATTACH → sock_map_get_from_fd → sock_map_prog_update
- BPF_LINK_CREATE → sock_map_link_create → sock_map_prog_update
- replace prog → sock_map_link_update_prog
A new helper for this check is probably needed, called from both
sock_map_prog_update() and sock_map_link_update_prog().
Since this rejects the program at attach time rather than fixing a
runtime crash,
I'm not sure a Fixes tag is appropriate here - thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 12:35 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf, sockmap: fix use-after-free when the stream parser resizes the skb Sechang Lim
2026-06-12 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 22:36 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-06-18 5:58 ` Sechang Lim
2026-06-18 0:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-18 4:57 ` Sechang Lim
2026-06-18 2:45 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-06-18 5:19 ` Sechang Lim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-12 11:34 Sechang Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04931588-e708-40d8-a1b7-3700a1a3b376@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox