diff for duplicates of <072101da2558$fe5f5020$fb1df060$@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index aa90c6e..6da241b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From David Vernet's WG summary:
+>From David Vernet's WG summary:
 > After this update, the discussion moved to a topic for the BPF ISA
 document that has yet to be resolved:
 > ISA RFC compliance. Dave pointed out that we still need to specify which
@@ -57,3 +57,8 @@ doesn't support this simply won't
 Comments? (Let the bikeshedding begin...)
 
 Dave
+
+-- 
+Bpf mailing list
+Bpf@ietf.org
+https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 6e8232a..6c0ff0b 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
  "ref\020231127201817.GB5421@maniforge\0"
- "From\0dthaler1968@googlemail.com\0"
- "Subject\0BPF ISA conformance groups\0"
+ "From\0dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org\0"
+ "Subject\0[Bpf] BPF ISA conformance groups\0"
  "Date\0Sat, 2 Dec 2023 11:51:50 -0800\0"
  "To\0<bpf@ietf.org>"
  " <bpf@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "From David Vernet's WG summary:\n"
+ ">From David Vernet's WG summary:\n"
  "> After this update, the discussion moved to a topic for the BPF ISA\n"
  "document that has yet to be resolved:\n"
  "> ISA RFC compliance. Dave pointed out that we still need to specify which\n"
@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
  "\n"
  "Comments? (Let the bikeshedding begin...)\n"
  "\n"
- Dave
+ "Dave\n"
+ "\n"
+ "-- \n"
+ "Bpf mailing list\n"
+ "Bpf@ietf.org\n"
+ https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
 
-1973be7d4442f1d93eb3eed2541f7b0147bce210ab37a01ddacedba704d10aa4
+4e78d00b39e863a0e42e587462b79f194efd29883de3769ff89ac8890fcd6f44
