BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, houtao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	houtao1@huawei.com, Lorenz Bauer <oss@lmb.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests for reading a dangling map iter fd
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:18:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bc4545a-817f-e618-a208-79fc2a25a9cc@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809191357.ut6cza5x6t6ho4ej@kafai-mbp>



On 8/9/22 12:13 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:23:39AM +0800, houtao wrote:
>>>> +    /* Sock map is freed after two synchronize_rcu() calls, so wait */
>>>> +    kern_sync_rcu();
>>>> +    kern_sync_rcu();
>>>
>>> In btf_map_in_map.c, the comment mentions two kern_sync_rcu()
>>> is needed for 5.8 and earlier kernel. Other cases in prog_tests/
>>> directory only has one kern_sync_rcu(). Why we need two
>>> kern_sync_rcu() for the current kernel?
>> As tried to explain in the comment,  for both sock map and sock storage map, the
>> used memory is freed two synchronize_rcu(), so if there are not two
>> kern_sync_rcu() in the test prog, reading the iterator fd will not be able to
>> trigger the Use-After-Free problem and it will end normally.
> For sk storage map, the map can also be used by the
> kernel sk_clone_lock() code path.  The deferred prog and map
> free is not going to help since it only ensures no bpf prog is
> still using it but cannot ensure no kernel rcu reader is using it.
> There is more details comment in bpf_local_storage_map_free() to
> explain for both synchronize_rcu()s.

Thanks for explanation!

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-06  7:40 [PATCH bpf 0/9] fixes for bpf map iterator Hou Tao
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 1/9] bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for array " Hou Tao
2022-08-08 14:53   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-09  1:07     ` houtao
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 2/9] bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for hash " Hou Tao
2022-08-08 14:54   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 3/9] bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for sock local storage " Hou Tao
2022-08-08 14:54   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 4/9] bpf: Acquire map uref in .init_seq_private for sock{map,hash} iterator Hou Tao
2022-08-08 14:55   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 5/9] bpf: Check the validity of max_rdwr_access for sk storage map iterator Hou Tao
2022-08-08 14:56   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-09 18:46   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-10  1:34     ` Hou Tao
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 6/9] bpf: Only allow sleepable program for resched-able iterator Hou Tao
2022-08-08 15:07   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests for reading a dangling map iter fd Hou Tao
2022-08-08 15:15   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-09  1:23     ` houtao
2022-08-09 19:13       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-10  0:18         ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add write tests for sk storage map iterator Hou Tao
2022-08-08 15:27   ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-09  1:26     ` houtao
2022-08-06  7:40 ` [PATCH bpf 9/9] selftests/bpf: Ensure sleepable program is rejected by hash map iter Hou Tao
2022-08-08 15:30   ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bc4545a-817f-e618-a208-79fc2a25a9cc@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=oss@lmb.io \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox