public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>, <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/2] libbpf: Fix bpf_get_link_xdp_id flags handling
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:09:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e9e30490b44b447bb2bebc69c7135e7fe7e4e40.1586236080.git.rdna@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1586236080.git.rdna@fb.com>

Currently if one of XDP_FLAGS_{DRV,HW,SKB}_MODE flags is passed to
bpf_get_link_xdp_id() and there is a single XDP program attached to
ifindex, that program's id will be returned by bpf_get_link_xdp_id() in
prog_id argument no matter what mode the program is attached in, i.e.
flags argument is not taken into account.

For example, if there is a single program attached with
XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE but user calls bpf_get_link_xdp_id() with flags =
XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE, that skb program will be returned.

Fix it by returning info->prog_id only if user didn't specify flags. If
flags is specified then return corresponding mode-specific-field from
struct xdp_link_info.

The initial error was introduced in commit 50db9f073188 ("libbpf: Add a
support for getting xdp prog id on ifindex") and then refactored in
473f4e133a12 so 473f4e133a12 is used in the Fixes tag.

Fixes: 473f4e133a12 ("libbpf: Add bpf_get_link_xdp_info() function to get more XDP information")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
index 18b5319025e1..f5732d35930d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ int bpf_get_link_xdp_info(int ifindex, struct xdp_link_info *info,
 
 static __u32 get_xdp_id(struct xdp_link_info *info, __u32 flags)
 {
-	if (info->attach_mode != XDP_ATTACHED_MULTI)
+	if (info->attach_mode != XDP_ATTACHED_MULTI && !flags)
 		return info->prog_id;
 	if (flags & XDP_FLAGS_DRV_MODE)
 		return info->drv_prog_id;
-- 
2.24.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-07  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07  5:09 [PATCH bpf 0/2] libbpf: Fix bpf_get_link_xdp_id flags handling Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-07  5:09 ` Andrey Ignatov [this message]
2020-04-07  9:04   ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-07  5:09 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_link_xdp_id Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-07 23:44 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] libbpf: Fix bpf_get_link_xdp_id flags handling Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e9e30490b44b447bb2bebc69c7135e7fe7e4e40.1586236080.git.rdna@fb.com \
    --to=rdna@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox