From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops caused by signed divide
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 07:21:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058c69c-3e2c-4c0b-b777-2b0460f443f9@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQ+o1jPQwxP9G9Xb=ZSEQDKKq1m1awpovKWdVRMNf8sgdg@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/9/24 10:29 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:21 AM Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently received a kernel 'oops' about a divide error.
>> After some research, it seems that the 'div64_s64' function used for the 'MOD'/'REM' instructions boils down to an 'idiv'.
>>
>> The 'dividend' is set to INT64_MIN, and the 'divisor' to -1, then because of two's complement, there is no corresponding positive value, causing the error (at least to my understanding).
>>
>>
>> Apologies if this is already known / not a relevant concern.
> Thanks for the report. This is a new issue.
>
> Yonghong,
>
> it's related to the new signed div insn.
> It sounds like we need to update chk_and_div[] part of
> the verifier to account for signed div differently.
In verifier, we have
/* [R,W]x div 0 -> 0 */
/* [R,W]x mod 0 -> [R,W]x */
What the value for
Rx_a sdiv Rx_b -> ?
where Rx_a = INT64_MIN and Rx_b = -1?
Should we just do
INT64_MIN sdiv -1 -> -1
or some other values?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 17:21 Kernel oops caused by signed divide Zac Ecob
2024-09-09 17:27 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-09 17:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-09 23:47 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 14:21 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-09-10 14:44 ` Dave Thaler
2024-09-10 15:18 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 15:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-10 18:12 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 15:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-10 18:02 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 18:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-10 19:32 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 21:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-10 22:00 ` Yonghong Song
2024-09-10 22:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058c69c-3e2c-4c0b-b777-2b0460f443f9@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=zacecob@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox