From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, thinker.li@gmail.com
Cc: kuifeng@meta.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
davemarchevsky@meta.com, dvernet@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] bpf: Create argument information for nullable arguments.
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 15:57:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <106aae3b-0a35-42d2-b3ef-b61da0212e7c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122b959-9b29-42e0-9931-63aced6298f9@linux.dev>
On 2/7/24 12:45, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 2/5/24 10:38 PM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>>
>> Collect argument information from the type information of stub
>> functions to
>> mark arguments of BPF struct_ops programs with PTR_MAYBE_NULL if they are
>> nullable. A nullable argument is annotated by suffixing "__nullable" at
>> the argument name of stub function.
>>
>> For nullable arguments, this patch sets an arg_info to label their
>> reg_type
>> with PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This makes the
>> verifier
>> to check programs and ensure that they properly check the pointer. The
>> programs should check if the pointer is null before accessing the pointed
>> memory.
>>
>> The implementer of a struct_ops type should annotate the arguments
>> that can
>> be null. The implementer should define a stub function (empty) as a
>> placeholder for each defined operator. The name of a stub function should
>> be in the pattern "<st_op_type>__<operator name>". For example, for
>> test_maybe_null of struct bpf_testmod_ops, it's stub function name should
>> be "bpf_testmod_ops__test_maybe_null". You mark an argument nullable by
>> suffixing the argument name with "__nullable" at the stub function.
>>
>> Since we already has stub functions for kCFI, we just reuse these stub
>> functions with the naming convention mentioned earlier. These stub
>> functions with the naming convention is only required if there are
>> nullable
>> arguments to annotate. For functions having not nullable arguments, stub
>> functions are not necessary for the purpose of this patch.
>>
>> This patch will prepare a list of struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux, aka
>> arg_info, for
>> each member field of a struct_ops type. "arg_info" will be assigned to
>> "prog->aux->ctx_arg_info" of BPF struct_ops programs in
>> check_struct_ops_btf_id() so that it can be used by btf_ctx_access()
>> later
>> to set reg_type properly for the verifier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bpf.h | 18 ++++
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 40 ++++++++
>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++
>> 4 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> index 9a2ee9456989..29d9ec1c4fd9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -1709,6 +1709,19 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
>> struct btf_func_model func_models[BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS];
>> };
>> +/* Every member of a struct_ops type has an instance even the member
>> is not
>> + * an operator (function pointer). The "arg_info" field will be
>> assigned to
>> + * prog->aux->arg_info of BPF struct_ops programs to provide the
>> argument
>> + * information required by the verifier to verify the program.
>> + *
>> + * btf_ctx_access() will lookup prog->aux->arg_info to find the
>> + * corresponding entry for an given argument.
>> + */
>> +struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info {
>
> nit. Shorten it to bpf_struct_ops_arg_info.
Sure!
>
>> + struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *arg_info;
>> + u32 arg_info_cnt;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct bpf_struct_ops_desc {
>> struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
>> @@ -1716,6 +1729,9 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_desc {
>> const struct btf_type *value_type;
>> u32 type_id;
>> u32 value_id;
>> +
>> + /* Collection of argument information for each member */
>> + struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info *member_arg_info;
>
> nit. Same here on the struct's field name. s/member_arg_info/arg_info(s)/.
>
Sure!
>> };
>> enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
>> @@ -2500,6 +2516,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_sk_lookup(struct bpf_prog
>> *prog,
>> int bpf_prog_test_run_nf(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>> union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
>> +int btf_ctx_arg_offset(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
>> *func_proto,
>> + u32 arg_no);
>
> This should be in btf.h. Its implementation is also in btf.c in this patch.
Got it! I just followed btf_ctx_access().
But, moving to btf.h make sense.
>
>> bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>> const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> index f98f580de77a..0db7e12a9244 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> @@ -116,17 +116,162 @@ static bool is_valid_value_type(struct btf
>> *btf, s32 value_id,
>> return true;
>> }
>> +#define MAYBE_NULL_SUFFIX "__nullable"
>> +#define MAX_STUB_NAME 128
>> +
>> +static bool match_nullable_suffix(const char *name)
>> +{
>> + int suffix_len, len;
>> +
>> + if (!name)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + suffix_len = sizeof(MAYBE_NULL_SUFFIX) - 1;
>> + len = strlen(name);
>> + if (len <= suffix_len)
>
> This function looks almost the same as __kfunc_param_match_suffix. How
> about refactor __kfunc_param_match_suffix (to btf.c?) and resue here to
> avoid duplicating code?
Sure!
>
> The only difference is between the "<=" here and the "<" there. I think
> the "<=" here may be a little better.
>
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return !strcmp(name + len - suffix_len, MAYBE_NULL_SUFFIX);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return the type info of a stub function, if it exists.
>> + *
>> + * The name of the stub function is made up of the name of the
>> struct_ops
>> + * and the name of the function pointer member, separated by "__". For
>> + * example, if the struct_ops is named "foo_ops" and the function
>> pointer
>> + * member is named "bar", the stub function name would be
>> "foo_ops__bar".
>> + */
>> +static const struct btf_type *
>
> I think there is double spaces.
>
>> +find_stub_func_proto(struct btf *btf, const char *st_op_name,
>> + const char *member_name)
>> +{
>> + char stub_func_name[MAX_STUB_NAME];
>> + const struct btf_type *t, *func_proto;
>> + s32 btf_id;
>> +
>> + snprintf(stub_func_name, MAX_STUB_NAME, "%s__%s",
>> + st_op_name, member_name);
>
> check truncated case.
Sure!
>
>> + btf_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, stub_func_name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
>> + if (btf_id < 0)
>> + return NULL;
>> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
>> + if (!t)
>> + return NULL;
>> + func_proto = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
>
> nit. directly "return btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);"
>
>> +
>> + return func_proto;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Prepare argument info for every nullable argument of a member of a
>> + * struct_ops type.
>> + *
>> + * Initialize a struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info according to type
>> + * info of the arguments of a stub function. (Check kCFI for more
>> + * information about stub functions.)
>> + *
>> + * Each member in the struct_ops type has a struct
>> + * bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info to provide an array of struct
>> + * bpf_ctx_arg_aux, which in turn provides the information that used
>> by the
>> + * verifier to check the arguments of the BPF struct_ops program
>> assigned
>> + * to the member. Here, we only care about the arguments that are
>> marked as
>> + * __nullable.
>> + *
>> + * The array of struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux is eventually assigned to
>> + * prog->aux->ctx_arg_info of BPF struct_ops programs and passed to the
>> + * verifier. (See check_struct_ops_btf_id())
>> + *
>> + * member_arg_info->arg_info will be the list of struct
>> bpf_ctx_arg_aux if
>> + * success. If fails, it will be kept untouched.
>> + */
>> +static int prepare_arg_info(struct btf *btf,
>> + const char *st_ops_name,
>> + const char *member_name,
>> + const struct btf_type *func_proto,
>> + struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info *member_arg_info)
>> +{
>> + const struct btf_type *stub_func_proto, *pointed_type;
>> + const struct btf_param *args, *member_args;
>> + struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *arg_info, *ai_buf;
>> + u32 nargs, arg_no, arg_info_cnt = 0;
>> + const char *arg_name;
>> + s32 arg_btf_id;
>> + int offset;
>> +
>> + stub_func_proto = find_stub_func_proto(btf, st_ops_name,
>> member_name);
>> + if (!stub_func_proto)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + args = btf_params(stub_func_proto);
>> + nargs = btf_type_vlen(stub_func_proto);
>> + if (nargs != btf_type_vlen(func_proto)) {
>> + pr_warn("the number of arguments of the stub function %s__%s
>> does not match the number of arguments of the member %s of struct %s\n",
>> + st_ops_name, member_name, member_name, st_ops_name);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + member_args = btf_params(func_proto);
>
> hmm... the "member_args" naming makes me come back here a few times to
> figure out "member_args" is the original func_proto or the stub func_proto.
>
> How about using a similar convention like you did for func_proto:
> "func_proto" means the original func_proto and "stub_func_proto" means
> the stub func_proto,
>
> so something like:
>
> "args" means the args of original func_proto and
> "stub_args" means the args of the stub_func_proto ?
ok! I will rename all member_*.
>
>> +
>> + ai_buf = kcalloc(nargs, sizeof(*ai_buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> hmm... instead of ai, lets use a fuller name here like arg_info_buf.
>
>> + if (!ai_buf)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (arg_no = 0; arg_no < nargs; arg_no++) {
>> + /* Skip arguments that is not suffixed with
>> + * "__nullable".
>> + */
>> + arg_name = btf_name_by_offset(btf,
>> + args[arg_no].name_off);
>> + if (!match_nullable_suffix(arg_name))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* Should be a pointer to struct, array, scalar, or enum */
>> + pointed_type = btf_type_resolve_ptr(btf,
>> + member_args[arg_no].type,
>> + &arg_btf_id);
>> + if (!pointed_type ||
>> + !btf_type_is_struct(pointed_type))
>> + goto err_out;
>> +
>> + offset = btf_ctx_arg_offset(btf, stub_func_proto, arg_no);
>
> The original "func_proto" should be used here.
Right!
>
>> + if (offset < 0)
>> + goto err_out;
>> +
>> + /* Fill the information of the new argument */
>> + arg_info = ai_buf + arg_info_cnt++;
>
> nit. just init arg_info = arg_info_buf and advance the arg_info++ and
> arg_info_cnt++ after the offset assignment below.
>
>> + arg_info->reg_type =
>> + PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
>> + arg_info->btf_id = arg_btf_id;
>> + arg_info->btf = btf;
>> + arg_info->offset = offset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (arg_info_cnt) {
>> + member_arg_info->arg_info = ai_buf;
>> + member_arg_info->arg_info_cnt = arg_info_cnt;
>> + } else {
>> + kfree(ai_buf);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + kfree(ai_buf);
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>> struct btf *btf,
>> struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
>> {
>> + struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info *member_arg_info;
>> struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = st_ops_desc->st_ops;
>> const struct btf_member *member;
>> const struct btf_type *t;
>> s32 type_id, value_id;
>> char value_name[128];
>> const char *mname;
>> - int i;
>> + int i, err;
>> if (strlen(st_ops->name) + VALUE_PREFIX_LEN >=
>> sizeof(value_name)) {
>> @@ -160,6 +305,11 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct
>> bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>> if (!is_valid_value_type(btf, value_id, t, value_name))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + member_arg_info = kcalloc(btf_type_vlen(t),
>> sizeof(*member_arg_info),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!member_arg_info)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> for_each_member(i, t, member) {
>> const struct btf_type *func_proto;
>> @@ -167,32 +317,44 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct
>> bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>> if (!*mname) {
>> pr_warn("anon member in struct %s is not supported\n",
>> st_ops->name);
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + goto errout;
>> }
>> if (__btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member)) {
>> pr_warn("bit field member %s in struct %s is not
>> supported\n",
>> mname, st_ops->name);
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + goto errout;
>> }
>> func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf,
>> member->type,
>> NULL);
>> - if (func_proto &&
>> - btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
>> + if (!func_proto)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
>> func_proto, mname,
>> &st_ops->func_models[i])) {
>> pr_warn("Error in parsing func ptr %s in struct %s\n",
>> mname, st_ops->name);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto errout;
>> }
>> +
>> + err = prepare_arg_info(btf, st_ops->name, mname,
>> + func_proto,
>> + member_arg_info + i);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto errout;
>> }
>> if (st_ops->init(btf)) {
>> pr_warn("Error in init bpf_struct_ops %s\n",
>> st_ops->name);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto errout;
>> }
>> st_ops_desc->type_id = type_id;
>> @@ -200,7 +362,16 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct
>> bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>> st_ops_desc->value_id = value_id;
>> st_ops_desc->value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
>> + st_ops_desc->member_arg_info = member_arg_info;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +errout:
>> + while (i > 0)
>> + kfree(member_arg_info[--i].arg_info);
>> + kfree(member_arg_info);
>> +
>> + return err;
>> }
>> static int bpf_struct_ops_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void
>> *key,
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> index aa72674114af..6df390ade2c0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> @@ -1699,6 +1699,21 @@ static void btf_free_struct_meta_tab(struct btf
>> *btf)
>> static void btf_free_struct_ops_tab(struct btf *btf)
>> {
>> struct btf_struct_ops_tab *tab = btf->struct_ops_tab;
>> + struct bpf_struct_ops_member_arg_info *ma_info;
>
> Please try to stay consistent with the variable naming in the same
> patch. The other of this patch is using the "member_arg_info" name.
>
> May be just use "arg_infos" everywhere.
I will rename all member_*.
>
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> + if (!tab)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < tab->cnt; i++) {
>> + ma_info = tab->ops[i].member_arg_info;
>> + if (!ma_info)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < btf_type_vlen(tab->ops[i].type); j++)
>> + kfree(ma_info[j].arg_info);
>> + kfree(ma_info);
>
>
> Lets refactor this part out to "bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct
> bpf_struct_ops_desc *)" such that it can be reused with the "errout"
> path of the "bpf_struct_ops_desc_init()" above.
Sure!
>
>
>> + }
>> kfree(tab);
>> btf->struct_ops_tab = NULL;
>> @@ -6130,6 +6145,31 @@ static bool prog_args_trusted(const struct
>> bpf_prog *prog)
>> }
>> }
>> +int btf_ctx_arg_offset(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
>> *func_proto,
>> + u32 arg_no)
>> +{
>> + const struct btf_param *args;
>> + const struct btf_type *t;
>> + int off = 0, i;
>> + u32 sz, nargs;
>> +
>> + nargs = btf_type_vlen(func_proto);
>> + /* It is the return value if arg_no == nargs */
>> + if (arg_no > nargs)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + args = btf_params(func_proto);
>> + for (i = 0; i < arg_no; i++) {
>> + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, args[i].type);
>> + t = btf_resolve_size(btf, t, &sz);
>> + if (IS_ERR(t))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + off += roundup(sz, 8);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return off;
>> +}
>> +
>> bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>> const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index 64fa188d00ad..8d7e761cda0d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -20433,6 +20433,12 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct
>> bpf_verifier_env *env)
>> }
>> }
>> + /* btf_ctx_access() used this to provide argument type info */
>> + prog->aux->ctx_arg_info =
>> + st_ops_desc->member_arg_info[member_idx].arg_info;
>> + prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size =
>> + st_ops_desc->member_arg_info[member_idx].arg_info_cnt;
>> +
>> prog->aux->attach_func_proto = func_proto;
>> prog->aux->attach_func_name = mname;
>> env->ops = st_ops->verifier_ops;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 6:38 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Support PTR_MAYBE_NULL for struct_ops arguments thinker.li
2024-02-06 6:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] bpf: add btf pointer to struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux thinker.li
2024-02-06 6:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] bpf: Create argument information for nullable arguments thinker.li
2024-02-07 20:45 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-07 23:57 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-02-06 6:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test PTR_MAYBE_NULL arguments of struct_ops operators thinker.li
2024-02-07 19:35 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-07 22:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-08 0:54 ` Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=106aae3b-0a35-42d2-b3ef-b61da0212e7c@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
--cc=dvernet@meta.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox