From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Properly enable hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:36:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150ce627-856d-d85a-61da-951ba3754537@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230126225030.510629-1-sdf@google.com>
On 26/01/2023 23.50, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> The existing timestamping_enable() is a no-op because it applies
> to the socket-related path that we are not verifying here
> anymore. (but still leaving the code around hoping we can
> have xdp->skb path verified here as well)
>
> poll: 1 (0)
> xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
> 0xf64788: rx_desc[0]->addr=100000000008000 addr=8100 comp_addr=8000
> rx_hash: 3697961069
> rx_timestamp: 1674657672142214773 (sec:1674657672.1422)
> XDP RX-time: 1674657709561774876 (sec:1674657709.5618) delta sec:37.4196
> AF_XDP time: 1674657709561871034 (sec:1674657709.5619) delta
> sec:0.0001 (96.158 usec)
> 0xf64788: complete idx=8 addr=8000
>
Again for the record, this output is from my devel version of
xdp_hw_metadata and not what is currently upstream.
Small nit below, which is too late as this is already applied.
> Also, maybe something to archive here, see [0] for Jesper's note
> about NIC vs host clock delta.
>
> 0: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f3a116dc-1b14-3432-ad20-a36179ef0608@redhat.com/
>
> v2:
> - Restore original value (Martin)
>
> Fixes: 297a3f124155 ("selftests/bpf: Simple program to dump XDP RX metadata")
> Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 0008f0f239e8..3823b1c499cc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
> #include <linux/udp.h>
> #include <linux/sockios.h>
> +#include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <net/if.h>
> #include <poll.h>
> @@ -278,13 +279,53 @@ static int rxq_num(const char *ifname)
>
> ret = ioctl(fd, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr);
> if (ret < 0)
> - error(-1, errno, "socket");
> + error(-1, errno, "ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL)");
>
> close(fd);
>
> return ch.rx_count + ch.combined_count;
> }
>
> +static void hwtstamp_ioctl(int op, const char *ifname, struct hwtstamp_config *cfg)
> +{
> + struct ifreq ifr = {
> + .ifr_data = (void *)cfg,
> + };
> + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, ifname);
I would use strncpy like:
strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, ifname, IFNAMSIZ - 1);
> + int fd, ret;
> +
> + fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + error(-1, errno, "socket");
> +
> + ret = ioctl(fd, op, &ifr);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + error(-1, errno, "ioctl(%d)", op);
> +
> + close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static struct hwtstamp_config saved_hwtstamp_cfg;
> +static const char *saved_hwtstamp_ifname;
> +
> +static void hwtstamp_restore(void)
> +{
> + hwtstamp_ioctl(SIOCSHWTSTAMP, saved_hwtstamp_ifname, &saved_hwtstamp_cfg);
> +}
> +
> +static void hwtstamp_enable(const char *ifname)
> +{
> + struct hwtstamp_config cfg = {
> + .rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL,
> + };
> +
> + hwtstamp_ioctl(SIOCGHWTSTAMP, ifname, &saved_hwtstamp_cfg);
> + saved_hwtstamp_ifname = strdup(ifname);
> + atexit(hwtstamp_restore);
> +
> + hwtstamp_ioctl(SIOCSHWTSTAMP, ifname, &cfg);
> +}
> +
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_attach_opts, opts);
> @@ -341,6 +382,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> printf("rxq: %d\n", rxq);
>
> + hwtstamp_enable(ifname);
> +
> rx_xsk = malloc(sizeof(struct xsk) * rxq);
> if (!rx_xsk)
> error(-1, ENOMEM, "malloc");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 22:50 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Properly enable hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2023-01-27 7:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-27 13:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2023-01-27 17:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150ce627-856d-d85a-61da-951ba3754537@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox