From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Luke Nelson" <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] s390/bpf: Add orig_gpr2 to user_pt_regs
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 13:49:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1643982436.03nza6qz50.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80a92fcc73e537b56491f8313574bea6dfa1c1c8.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 08:21 +0000, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> > Hi Heiko,
>> >
>> > Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:41:58AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> > > > user_pt_regs is used by eBPF in order to access userspace
>> > > > registers -
>> > > > see commit 466698e654e8 ("s390/bpf: correct broken uapi for
>> > > > BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type"). In order to access the
>> > > > first
>> > > > syscall argument from eBPF programs, we need to export
>> > > > orig_gpr2.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +-
>> > > > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
>> > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > index 4ffa8e7f0ed3..c8698e643904 100644
>> > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > @@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ struct pt_regs {
>> > > > unsigned long args[1];
>> > > > psw_t psw;
>> > > > unsigned long gprs[NUM_GPRS];
>> > > > + unsigned long orig_gpr2;
>> > > > };
>> > > > };
>> > > > - unsigned long orig_gpr2;
>> > > > union {
>> > > > struct {
>> > > > unsigned int int_code;
>> > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > index ad64d673b5e6..b3dec603f507 100644
>> > > > --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
>> > > > @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ typedef struct {
>> > > > unsigned long args[1];
>> > > > psw_t psw;
>> > > > unsigned long gprs[NUM_GPRS];
>> > > > + unsigned long orig_gpr2;
>> > > > } user_pt_regs;
>> > >
>> > > Isn't this broken on nearly all architectures? I just checked
>> > > powerpc,
>> > > arm64, and riscv. While powerpc seems to mirror pt_regs as
>> > > user_pt_regs,
>> > > and therefore exports orig_gpr3, the bpf macros still seem to
>> > > access the
>> > > wrong location to access the first syscall parameter(?).
>> >
>> > On powerpc, gpr[3] continues to be valid on syscall entry (so this
>> > test
>> > passes on powerpc), though orig_gpr3 will remain valid throughout.
>>
>> Hmm.. we can't use orig_gpr3 since we don't use a syscall wrapper.
>> All
>> system calls just receive the parameters directly.
>>
>> - Naveen
>
> Right, I ran into this yesterday as well.
> I solved it in v2
> (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204041955.1958263-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/)
> by introducing a macro that hides whether or not an arch uses a syscall
> wrapper.
Thanks. I missed your patches. I will take a look.
- Naveen
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 23:41 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on s390 Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-02-01 23:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] s390/bpf: Add orig_gpr2 to user_pt_regs Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-02-02 14:19 ` Vasily Gorbik
2022-02-02 17:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-03 9:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-02-02 20:14 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-02-02 22:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-04 6:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-04 8:21 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-02-04 12:20 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-02-04 13:49 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2022-02-01 23:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix an endianness issue in bpf_syscall_macro test Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-02-01 23:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on s390 Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1643982436.03nza6qz50.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox