From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DE4C433EF for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229569AbiBITuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:50:10 -0500 Received: from gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com ([23.128.96.19]:40666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229481AbiBITuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:50:10 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F26E04A464; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD30B61A5E; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 143E3C340ED; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:50:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1644436209; bh=e8pFvxbhVbgkPJkmtPCFaSXj3mo359c3fo7jbgvyb3g=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=pmKkCDn4T19FF6cOMV2tpd42bcr4uKdK7OxXuLutkGplb2+uqZ2SjiuVdoswDFIIK rnsCK+2ypNOXMzc3hsAMkcjDYmadBfMZE41u1Kcxz9rzEN9OoZtsdN3j/eWJyyb8Xf 4NaNpGxtdE20UTOnpc2Hk2th2rOhCOaZ6RHDmL9FE20YX1Yviro0jFb0tSBFbKWMR6 JtZhG0Iqtl1Axf92K5LY7evz9t8IF1ma+rgXMl3YiDN6KzCD8orfM1l54CHduQDVs3 zdoQz2+h4vHTsZpSiiA4zHRlRdOv+PA/rnMaW+yVuLzo03GPx+il9FPngRvn1J7M02 9/6uvidHWA2Ug== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11CDE6D447; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Split bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <164443620898.30796.17334556024163355601.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:50:08 +0000 References: <20220209184333.654927-1-jakub@cloudflare.com> In-Reply-To: <20220209184333.654927-1-jakub@cloudflare.com> To: Jakub Sitnicki Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com, yhs@fb.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:43:31 +0100 you wrote: > Following the recent split-up of the bpf_sock dst_port field, apply the same to > technique to the bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field to make uAPI more user > friendly. > > v1 -> v2: > - Remove remote_port range check and cast to be16 in TEST_RUN for sk_lookup > (kernel test robot) > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9a69e2b385f4 - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover 4-byte load from remote_port in bpf_sk_lookup https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2ed0dc5937d3 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html