BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 03:30:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164964781231.15976.11920610137850939633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220409125958.92629-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Sat,  9 Apr 2022 12:59:54 +0000 you wrote:
> We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
> not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
> libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.
> 
> This patchset cleanups the usage of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in tools/bpf/,
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf and samples/bpf. The file
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h is removed. The included header
> sys/resource.h is removed from many files as it is useless in these files.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b25acdafd373
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/4] selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b858ba8c52b6
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/4] bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a777e18f1bcd
  - [bpf-next,v4,4/4] tools/runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/451b5fbc2c56

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  3:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-09 12:59 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] selftests/bpf: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] bpftool: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] tools/runqslower: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-11  3:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164964781231.15976.11920610137850939633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox