From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 03:30:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164964781231.15976.11920610137850939633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220409125958.92629-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:59:54 +0000 you wrote:
> We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
> not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
> libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.
>
> This patchset cleanups the usage of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in tools/bpf/,
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf and samples/bpf. The file
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h is removed. The included header
> sys/resource.h is removed from many files as it is useless in these files.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v4,1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b25acdafd373
- [bpf-next,v4,2/4] selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b858ba8c52b6
- [bpf-next,v4,3/4] bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a777e18f1bcd
- [bpf-next,v4,4/4] tools/runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/451b5fbc2c56
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-09 12:59 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] selftests/bpf: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] bpftool: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-09 12:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] tools/runqslower: " Yafang Shao
2022-04-11 3:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164964781231.15976.11920610137850939633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox