From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CFEC43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349044AbiFGR5t (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:57:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39712 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344460AbiFGR52 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:57:28 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D11149153 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D08B82285 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF715C34115; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:40:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1654623617; bh=aYU22WvdZiB0ccBRKk57IpwAo0BX+yFgYbJzHmn/yRk=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=IP62N8034+T2JDlpxg5/fh473mPj1exSuFXIj824F5yXxMo0hTg4Si2sxobUWKpXR CaxlzLf1w/ELoGJ0KUbL3w7xhDmmVMxj1KFdpo7ILIWZEuVwI3gIcczyAyMiW2c6ww CGa9UfQRZaiavK3mZJScu3rnrxUN/iQxEQ0mEzvOWIPanuLw3sg/0RbN4S1Zrv3yjM MHjTzPDiU8k+/7rx4JRNVNDYTSeDAN9qdpd8b/T8VupJ/PEs4oigV6bBKAU8/EHvbf jWjCNo/CzrebMCz8VAboDMohFcbbhobhgROWhHbxhb4dPfKzVftDTyoeoAMMNNjFDH aceVmt8S7jiew== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD11E737FC; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/17] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <165462361769.5218.5561986964163226721.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:40:17 +0000 References: <20220607062554.3716237-1-yhs@fb.com> In-Reply-To: <20220607062554.3716237-1-yhs@fb.com> To: Yonghong Song Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 23:25:54 -0700 you wrote: > Currently, btf only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM. > But in kernel, some enum has 64bit values, e.g., in uapi bpf.h, we have > enum { > BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL, > BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK, > BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32), > }; > With BTF_KIND_ENUM, the value for BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK will be encoded > as 0 which is incorrect. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v5,01/17] bpf: Add btf enum64 support https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6089fb325cf7 - [bpf-next,v5,02/17] libbpf: Permit 64bit relocation value https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/776281652ddc - [bpf-next,v5,03/17] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b58b2b3a3122 - [bpf-next,v5,04/17] libbpf: Refactor btf__add_enum() for future code sharing https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8479aa752226 - [bpf-next,v5,05/17] libbpf: Add enum64 parsing and new enum64 public API https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dffbbdc2d988 - [bpf-next,v5,06/17] libbpf: Add enum64 deduplication support https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2ef2026349cf - [bpf-next,v5,07/17] libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d90ec262b35b - [bpf-next,v5,08/17] libbpf: Add enum64 sanitization https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f2a625889bb8 - [bpf-next,v5,09/17] libbpf: Add enum64 support for bpf linking https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6ec7d79be202 - [bpf-next,v5,10/17] libbpf: Add enum64 relocation support https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/23b2a3a8f63a - [bpf-next,v5,11/17] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/58a53978fdf6 - [bpf-next,v5,12/17] selftests/bpf: Fix selftests failure https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d932815a4394 - [bpf-next,v5,13/17] selftests/bpf: Test new enum kflag and enum64 API functions https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2b7301457ffe - [bpf-next,v5,14/17] selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 unit tests https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3b5325186dfa - [bpf-next,v5,15/17] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/adc26d134ef3 - [bpf-next,v5,16/17] selftests/bpf: Add a test for enum64 value relocations https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f4db3dd5284d - [bpf-next,v5,17/17] docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/61dbd5982964 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html