From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, cutaylor-pub@yahoo.com,
atenart@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, joe@cilium.io,
i@lmb.io, kafai@fb.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bpf: fix request_sock leak in filter.c
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165530401349.30434.14644430973088453576.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615011540.813025-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:15:40 +1000 you wrote:
> v2 of this patch contains, refactor as per Daniel Borkmann's suggestions to
> validate RCU flags on the listen socket so that it balances with
> bpf_sk_release() and update comments as per Martin KaFai Lau's suggestion.
> One small change to Daniels suggestion, put "sk = sk2" under "if (sk2 != sk)"
> to avoid an extra instruction.
>
> A customer reported a request_socket leak in a Calico cloud environment. We
> found that a BPF program was doing a socket lookup with takes a refcnt on
> the socket and that it was finding the request_socket but returning the parent
> LISTEN socket via sk_to_full_sk() without decrementing the child request socket
> 1st, resulting in request_sock slab object leak. This patch retains the
> existing behaviour of returning full socks to the caller but it also decrements
> the child request_socket if one is present before doing so to prevent the leak.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] net: bpf: fix request_sock leak in filter.c
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/3046a827316c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 1:15 [PATCH v2] net: bpf: fix request_sock leak in filter.c Jon Maxwell
2022-06-15 14:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165530401349.30434.14644430973088453576.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cutaylor-pub@yahoo.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=i@lmb.io \
--cc=jmaxwell37@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox