From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value()
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:30:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165840661389.30255.12097142217891066504.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtZ+LpgPADm7BeEd@kili>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:49:34 +0300 you wrote:
> The code here is supposed to take a signed int and store it in a
> signed long long. Unfortunately, the way that the type promotion works
> with this conditional statement is that it takes a signed int, type
> promotes it to a __u32, and then stores that as a signed long long.
> The result is never negative.
>
> Fixes: d90ec262b35b ("libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c6018fc6e7b6
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-19 9:49 [PATCH] libbpf: fix sign expansion bug in btf_dump_get_enum_value() Dan Carpenter
2022-07-19 17:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-19 18:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-19 23:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-21 12:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165840661389.30255.12097142217891066504.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox