BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com, paulburton@kernel.org,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:00:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166178161672.22044.323887276798287961.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1661742309-2320-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:05:09 +0800 you wrote:
> MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is 33, so min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff) is always
> MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, it is better to use MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT directly.
> 
> At the same time, add BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT > 0xffff) with a
> comment on why the assertion is there.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Suggested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bbcf0f55e578

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29  3:05 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT Tiezhu Yang
2022-08-29 14:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=166178161672.22044.323887276798287961.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox