BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
To: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <martin.lau@linux.dev>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] selftests/bpf: fix memory leak of lsm_cgroup
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:29:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1668482980-16163-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com> (raw)

kmemleak reports this issue:

unreferenced object 0xffff88810b7835c0 (size 32):
  comm "test_progs", pid 270, jiffies 4294969007 (age 1621.315s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    03 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000376cdeab>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0x110
    [<000000003bcdb3b6>] selinux_sk_alloc_security+0x66/0x110
    [<000000003959008f>] security_sk_alloc+0x47/0x80
    [<00000000e7bc6668>] sk_prot_alloc+0xbd/0x1a0
    [<0000000002d6343a>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x940
    [<000000009812a46d>] unix_create1+0x8f/0x3d0
    [<000000005ed0976b>] unix_create+0xa1/0x150
    [<0000000086a1d27f>] __sock_create+0x233/0x4a0
    [<00000000cffe3a73>] __sys_socket_create.part.0+0xaa/0x110
    [<0000000007c63f20>] __sys_socket+0x49/0xf0
    [<00000000b08753c8>] __x64_sys_socket+0x42/0x50
    [<00000000b56e26b3>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
    [<000000009b4871b8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The issue occurs in the following scenarios:

unix_create1()
  sk_alloc()
    sk_prot_alloc()
      security_sk_alloc()
        call_int_hook()
          hlist_for_each_entry()
            entry1->hook.sk_alloc_security
            <-- selinux_sk_alloc_security() succeeded,
            <-- sk->security alloced here.
            entry2->hook.sk_alloc_security
            <-- bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security() failed
      goto out_free;
        ...    <-- the sk->security not freed, memleak

The core problem is that the LSM is not yet fully stacked (work is
actively going on in this space) which means that some LSM hooks do
not support multiple LSMs at the same time. To fix, skip the
"EPERM" test when it runs in the environments that already have
non-bpf lsms installed

Fixes: dca85aac8895 ("selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c      |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
index 1102e4f..f117bfe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
@@ -173,10 +173,12 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 4, "total prog count");
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd2, NULL), 1, "total prog count");
 
-	/* AF_UNIX is prohibited. */
-
 	fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
-	ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "socket(AF_UNIX)");
+	if (!(skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+	    || skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX
+	    || skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK))
+		/* AF_UNIX is prohibited. */
+		ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "socket(AF_UNIX)");
 	close(fd);
 
 	/* AF_INET6 gets default policy (sk_priority). */
@@ -233,11 +235,18 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void)
 
 	/* AF_INET6+SOCK_STREAM
 	 * AF_PACKET+SOCK_RAW
+	 * AF_UNIX+SOCK_RAW if already have non-bpf lsms installed
 	 * listen_fd
 	 * client_fd
 	 * accepted_fd
 	 */
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->called_socket_post_create2, 5, "called_create2");
+	if (skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+	    || skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX
+	    || skel->kconfig->CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK)
+		/* AF_UNIX+SOCK_RAW if already have non-bpf lsms installed */
+		ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->called_socket_post_create2, 6, "called_create2");
+	else
+		ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->called_socket_post_create2, 5, "called_create2");
 
 	/* start_server
 	 * bind(ETH_P_ALL)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c
index 4f2d60b..02c11d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
+extern bool CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR __kconfig __weak;
+
 #ifndef AF_PACKET
 #define AF_PACKET 17
 #endif
@@ -140,6 +144,10 @@ int BPF_PROG(socket_bind2, struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address,
 int BPF_PROG(socket_alloc, struct sock *sk, int family, gfp_t priority)
 {
 	called_socket_alloc++;
+	/* if already have non-bpf lsms installed, EPERM will cause memory leak of non-bpf lsms */
+	if (CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX || CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK || CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR)
+		return 1;
+
 	if (family == AF_UNIX)
 		return 0; /* EPERM */
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15  3:29 Wang Yufen [this message]
2022-11-15  3:11 ` [PATCH bpf v2] selftests/bpf: fix memory leak of lsm_cgroup Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17  7:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1668482980-16163-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox