Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/6] Support stashing local kptrs with bpf_kptr_xchg

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:01:05 -0800 you wrote:
> Local kptrs are kptrs allocated via bpf_obj_new with a type specified in program
> BTF. A BPF program which creates a local kptr has exclusive control of the
> lifetime of the kptr, and, prior to terminating, must:
> 
>   * free the kptr via bpf_obj_drop
>   * If the kptr is a {list,rbtree} node, add the node to a {list, rbtree},
>     thereby passing control of the lifetime to the collection
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1,bpf-next,1/6] bpf: verifier: Rename kernel_type_name helper to btf_type_name
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b32a5dae44cc
  - [v1,bpf-next,2/6] bpf: btf: Remove unused btf_field_info_type enum
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a4aa38897b6a
  - [v1,bpf-next,3/6] bpf: Change btf_record_find enum parameter to field_mask
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/74843b57ec70
  - [v1,bpf-next,4/6] bpf: Support __kptr to local kptrs
    (no matching commit)
  - [v1,bpf-next,5/6] bpf: Allow local kptrs to be exchanged via bpf_kptr_xchg
    (no matching commit)
  - [v1,bpf-next,6/6] selftests/bpf: Add local kptr stashing test
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html