Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] Provide bpf_for() and bpf_for_each() by libbpf

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:21:42 -0700 you wrote:
> This patch set moves bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() macros from
> selftests-internal bpf_misc.h header to libbpf-provided bpf_helpers.h header.
> To do this in a way to allow users to feature-detect and guard such
> bpf_for()/bpf_for_each() uses on old kernels we also extend libbpf to improve
> unresolved kfunc calls handling and reporting. This lets us mark
> bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() declarations as __weak, and thus not fail
> program loading outright if such kfuncs are missing on the host kernel.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/6] libbpf: misc internal libbpf clean ups around log fixup
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3055ddd654f6
  - [bpf-next,2/6] libbpf: report vmlinux vs module name when dealing with ksyms
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f709160d1724
  - [bpf-next,3/6] libbpf: improve handling of unresolved kfuncs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/05b6f766b25c
  - [bpf-next,4/6] selftests/bpf: add missing __weak kfunc log fixup test
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/30bbfe3236b0
  - [bpf-next,5/6] libbpf: move bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() into bpf_helpers.h
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c5e647416708
  - [bpf-next,6/6] libbpf: mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy} as __weak
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/94dccba79520

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html