public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow needs to consider BTF_MEMBER_BITFIELD_SIZE
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 13:50:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <168294902013.3340.3030217679252571442.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230428013638.1581263-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 18:36:38 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> 
> The btf_dump/struct_data selftest is failing with:
> test_btf_dump_struct_data:FAIL:unexpected return value dumping fs_context unexpected unexpected return value dumping fs_context: actual -7 != expected 264
> 
> The reason is in btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow(). It does not use
> BTF_MEMBER_BITFIELD_SIZE from the struct's member (btf_member). Instead,
> it is using the enum size which is 4. It had been working till the recent
> commit 4e04143c869c ("fs_context: drop the unused lsm_flags member")
> removed an integer member which also removed the 4 bytes padding at the end
> of the fs_context. Missing this 4 bytes padding exposed this bug.
> In particular, when btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow() reaches
> the member 'phase', -E2BIG is returned.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf-next] libbpf: btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow needs to consider BTF_MEMBER_BITFIELD_SIZE
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c39028b333f3

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-01 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-28  1:36 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: btf_dump_type_data_check_overflow needs to consider BTF_MEMBER_BITFIELD_SIZE Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-28  2:26 ` Yonghong Song
2023-04-28  2:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 13:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=168294902013.3340.3030217679252571442.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox