From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] Add precision propagation for subprogs and callbacks
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 05:50:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168326582268.19364.13895089224168488627.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230505043317.3629845-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:07 -0700 you wrote:
> As more and more real-world BPF programs become more complex
> and increasingly use subprograms (both static and global), scalar precision
> tracking and its (previously weak) support for BPF subprograms (and callbacks
> as a special case of that) is becoming more and more of an issue and
> limitation. Couple that with increasing reliance on state equivalence (BPF
> open-coded iterators have a hard requirement for state equivalence to converge
> and successfully validate loops), and it becomes pretty critical to address
> this limitation and make precision tracking universally supported for BPF
> programs of any complexity and composition.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,bpf-next,01/10] veristat: add -t flag for adding BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ program flag
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5956f3011604
- [v3,bpf-next,02/10] bpf: mark relevant stack slots scratched for register read instructions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e0bf462276b6
- [v3,bpf-next,03/10] bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/407958a0e980
- [v3,bpf-next,04/10] bpf: improve precision backtrack logging
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d9439c21a9e4
- [v3,bpf-next,05/10] bpf: maintain bitmasks across all active frames in __mark_chain_precision
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1ef22b6865a7
- [v3,bpf-next,06/10] bpf: fix propagate_precision() logic for inner frames
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f655badf2a8f
- [v3,bpf-next,07/10] bpf: fix mark_all_scalars_precise use in mark_chain_precision
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c50c0b57a515
- [v3,bpf-next,08/10] bpf: support precision propagation in the presence of subprogs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fde2a3882bd0
- [v3,bpf-next,09/10] selftests/bpf: add precision propagation tests in the presence of subprogs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ef3d2177b1a
- [v3,bpf-next,10/10] selftests/bpf: revert iter test subprog precision workaround
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c91ab90cea7a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-05 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 4:33 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/10] Add precision propagation for subprogs and callbacks Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/10] veristat: add -t flag for adding BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ program flag Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: mark relevant stack slots scratched for register read instructions Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: improve precision backtrack logging Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: maintain bitmasks across all active frames in __mark_chain_precision Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: fix propagate_precision() logic for inner frames Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/10] bpf: fix mark_all_scalars_precise use in mark_chain_precision Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: support precision propagation in the presence of subprogs Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: add precision propagation tests " Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 4:33 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: revert iter test subprog precision workaround Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-05 5:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168326582268.19364.13895089224168488627.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox