From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
davemarchevsky@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Remove a WARN_ON_ONCE warning related to local kptr
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:20:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169289042532.8092.10627981183140434594.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824063417.201925-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:34:17 -0700 you wrote:
> Currently, in function bpf_obj_free_fields(), for local kptr,
> a warning will be issued if the struct does not contain any
> special fields. But actually the kernel seems totally okay
> with a local kptr without any special fields. Permitting
> no special fields also aligns with future percpu kptr which
> also allows no special fields.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Remove a WARN_ON_ONCE warning related to local kptr
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/393dc4bd92de
- [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add a local kptr test with no special fields
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/001fedacc907
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 6:34 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Remove a WARN_ON_ONCE warning related to local kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-24 6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add a local kptr test with no special fields Yonghong Song
2023-08-24 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169289042532.8092.10627981183140434594.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox