From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
hengqi.chen@gmail.com, liamwisehart@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't assume SHT_GNU_verdef presence for SHT_GNU_versym section
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:50:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169753622284.16413.11672373406256173995.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231016182840.4033346-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:28:40 -0700 you wrote:
> Fix too eager assumption that SHT_GNU_verdef ELF section is going to be
> present whenever binary has SHT_GNU_versym section. It seems like either
> SHT_GNU_verdef or SHT_GNU_verneed can be used, so failing on missing
> SHT_GNU_verdef actually breaks use cases in production.
>
> One specific reported issue, which was used to manually test this fix,
> was trying to attach to `readline` function in BASH binary.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] libbpf: don't assume SHT_GNU_verdef presence for SHT_GNU_versym section
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/137df1189d12
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-16 18:28 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't assume SHT_GNU_verdef presence for SHT_GNU_versym section Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-16 20:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-17 2:37 ` Hengqi Chen
2023-10-17 4:06 ` Fangrui Song
2023-10-17 5:26 ` Hengqi Chen
2023-10-16 22:10 ` Manu Bretelle
2023-10-17 9:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169753622284.16413.11672373406256173995.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox