BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Make linked_list failure test more robust
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:10:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169782182994.30621.4999717933918919408.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020144839.2734006-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:48:39 +0000 you wrote:
> The linked list failure test 'pop_front_off' and 'pop_back_off'
> currently rely on matching exact instruction and register values.  The
> purpose of the test is to ensure the offset is correctly incremented for
> the returned pointers from list pop helpers, which can then be used with
> container_of to obtain the real object. Hence, somehow obtaining the
> information that the offset is 48 will work for us. Make the test more
> robust by relying on verifier error string of bpf_spin_lock and remove
> dependence on fragile instruction index or register number, which can be
> affected by different clang versions used to build the selftests.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Make linked_list failure test more robust
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/da1055b673f3

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-20 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-20 14:48 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Make linked_list failure test more robust Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-10-20 16:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-20 17:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169782182994.30621.4999717933918919408.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox