public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 09/10] libbpf: Add common attr support for map_create
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 13:35:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16e155c2-294a-48b6-9339-75aa4edf8048@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzaw9cboFSf1OXmD84S7pKaeyj=bcQg_diUzGwAkFsjUgg@mail.gmail.com>



On 7/10/25 07:08, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:49 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> With the previous commit adding common attribute support for
>> BPF_MAP_CREATE, it is now possible to retrieve detailed error messages
>> when map creation fails by using the 'log_buf' field from the common
>> attributes.
>>
>> Extend 'bpf_map_create_opts' with these new fields, 'log_buf', 'log_size'
>> , 'log_level' and 'log_true_size', allowing users to capture and inspect
>
> comma
>

Ack.

>> those log messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h |  9 +++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> index 9cd79beb13a2d..ca66fcdb3f49f 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
>> @@ -203,10 +203,13 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>>                    __u32 key_size,
>>                    __u32 value_size,
>>                    __u32 max_entries,
>> -                  const struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts)
>> +                  struct bpf_map_create_opts *opts)
>
> this is a breaking change, see below
>
>>  {
>>         const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, excl_prog_hash_size);
>> +       const size_t common_attrs_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr);
>> +       struct bpf_common_attr common_attrs;
>>         union bpf_attr attr;
>> +       const char *log_buf;
>>         int fd;
>>
>>         bump_rlimit_memlock();
>> @@ -239,7 +242,17 @@ int bpf_map_create(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
>>         attr.excl_prog_hash = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash, NULL));
>>         attr.excl_prog_hash_size = OPTS_GET(opts, excl_prog_hash_size, 0);
>>
>> -       fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
>> +       log_buf = OPTS_GET(opts, log_buf, NULL);
>> +       if (log_buf && feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_EXTENDED_SYSCALL)) {
>> +               memset(&common_attrs, 0, common_attrs_sz);
>> +               common_attrs.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(log_buf);
>> +               common_attrs.log_size = OPTS_GET(opts, log_size, 0);
>> +               common_attrs.log_level = OPTS_GET(opts, log_level, 0);
>> +               fd = sys_bpf_ext_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz, &common_attrs, common_attrs_sz);
>> +               OPTS_SET(opts, log_true_size, common_attrs.log_true_size);
>> +       } else {
>> +               fd = sys_bpf_fd(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, attr_sz);
>> +       }
>>         return libbpf_err_errno(fd);
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> index e983a3e40d612..77d475e7274a0 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
>> @@ -57,16 +57,21 @@ struct bpf_map_create_opts {
>>
>>         const void *excl_prog_hash;
>>         __u32 excl_prog_hash_size;
>> +
>> +       const char *log_buf;
>> +       __u32 log_size;
>> +       __u32 log_level;
>> +       __u32 log_true_size;
>
> I'm thinking that maybe we should have a separate struct that will
> have these 4 fields, and pass a pointer to it. That way
> bpf_map_create_opts can still be passed as const pointer, but libbpf
> will still be able to write out log_true_size without violating
> constness
>
> and then we can reuse the same type (struct bpf_log? struct
> bpf_log_buf? struct bpf_log_info? not sure, let's bikeshed) across
> different commands that support passing log info through
> bpf_common_attrs
>

Sure, that makes sense.

I add a new 'struct bpf_log_attr' to encapsulate these four fields, and
it works well in my local testing.

This also keeps bpf_map_create_opts const-safe while making it easier to
reuse the same structure for other commands using bpf_common_attrs.

Thanks,
Leon

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02 15:48 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] bpf: Extend bpf syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 01/10] " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 23:08   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-09  5:15     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 03/10] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 18:34   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03  2:06     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf: Add common attr support " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 23:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03  2:25     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 05/10] bpf: Refactor reporting btf_log_true_size for btf_load Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] bpf: Add common attr support " Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 07/10] bpf: Add warnings for internal bugs in map_create Leon Hwang
2025-10-03  0:06   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03  2:31     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] bpf: Add common attr support for map_create Leon Hwang
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 09/10] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 23:08   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-09  5:35     ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-10-02 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test map create failure log Leon Hwang
2025-10-03  6:38 ` [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: Extend bpf syscall with common attributes support syzbot ci
2025-10-03  6:44   ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16e155c2-294a-48b6-9339-75aa4edf8048@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox