From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0437079C2; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 05:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705470934; cv=none; b=s07PjN4Yb7uMjcAr1VmYLX0M1f0LrM1/dbpPRuN6T2g84mvBOSOhpZ9NekUMZ/AimHVnwrXIArcq5fdH2BbZxejZtpl9AoO1NC8TQaCEcDR4+SQTOurVdT4rZCbizSGUP8Cye9ml6i77NsaC18T33hySz0NwfS5Oaz1JRJA6mCE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705470934; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aakhbWhnRWgzK/sjdw+/ZIoiU7KjVwjzSws1JZD46Zg=; h=X-Alimail-AntiSpam:Received:Message-ID:Subject:Date:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=D+HQuxtCWJkxWlTJHfL6zTmt6jjToHcdtvYg3EsvCiaAQ2oDyfykdqwoDkQkqv7OSvhV6o7mVwbUpIwl5YKSwIHZthfUsokqWI4jYkpQ7C/MNFcm+/8n8gh3TPRrua93b7HhRgVQ7KrwYIB36iq8UWkv9A0+FeLgsBHBpQLX6kA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R481e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045168;MF=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=13;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W-oMYkq_1705470921; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W-oMYkq_1705470921) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:55:22 +0800 Message-ID: <1705470800.285488-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/17] virtio-net: support AF_XDP zero copy (3/3) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:53:20 +0800 From: Xuan Zhuo To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski References: <20240116094313.119939-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <20240116070705.1cbfc042@kernel.org> <20240116154405-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240116154405-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:46:00 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 07:07:05AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:37:30 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > For future submission it would be better if you split this series in > > > smaller chunks: the maximum size allowed is 15 patches. > > > > Which does not mean you can split it up and post them all at the same > > time, FWIW. > > > Really it's just 17 I don't think it matters. Some patches could be > squashed easily but I think that would be artificial. Yes. About this patch set I think a lot. This is the core code for the function. I think we should not split it. And some commits are simply. Thanks. >