BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 04:30:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170555222794.4195.3268031757006579635.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118033143.3384355-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:31:38 -0800 you wrote:
> Follow up fixes for kernel-side and libbpf-side logic around handling arg:ctx
> (__arg_ctx) tagged arguments of BPF global subprogs.
> 
> Patch #1 adds libbpf feature detection of kernel-side __arg_ctx support to
> avoid unnecessary rewriting BTF types. With stricter kernel-side type
> enforcement this is now mandatory to avoid problems with using `struct
> bpf_user_pt_regs_t` instead of actual typedef. For __arg_ctx tagged arguments
> verifier is now supporting either `bpf_user_pt_regs_t` typedef or resolves it
> down to the actual struct (pt_regs/user_pt_regs/user_regs_struct), depending
> on architecture), but for old kernels without __arg_ctx support it's more
> backwards compatible for libbpf to use `struct bpf_user_pt_regs_t` rewrite
> which will work on wider range of kernels. So feature detection prevent libbpf
> accidentally breaking global subprogs on new kernels.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3,bpf,1/5] libbpf: feature-detect arg:ctx tag support in kernel
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/01b55f4f0cd6
  - [v3,bpf,2/5] bpf: extract bpf_ctx_convert_map logic and make it more reusable
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/66967a32d3b1
  - [v3,bpf,3/5] bpf: enforce types for __arg_ctx-tagged arguments in global subprogs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/0ba971511d16
  - [v3,bpf,4/5] selftests/bpf: add tests confirming type logic in kernel for __arg_ctx
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/989410cde819
  - [v3,bpf,5/5] libbpf: warn on unexpected __arg_ctx type when rewriting BTF
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/76ec90a996e3

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-18  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-18  3:31 [PATCH v3 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  3:31 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 1/5] libbpf: feature-detect arg:ctx tag support in kernel Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  3:31 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 2/5] bpf: extract bpf_ctx_convert_map logic and make it more reusable Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  3:31 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 3/5] bpf: enforce types for __arg_ctx-tagged arguments in global subprogs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  3:31 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 4/5] selftests/bpf: add tests confirming type logic in kernel for __arg_ctx Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  3:31 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 5/5] libbpf: warn on unexpected __arg_ctx type when rewriting BTF Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-18  4:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170555222794.4195.3268031757006579635.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox