From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, brho@google.com,
void@manifault.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Enable static subprog calls in spin lock critical sections
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 04:00:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170719202692.25774.2285679305015952977.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240204222349.938118-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 22:23:47 +0000 you wrote:
> This set allows a BPF program to make a call to a static subprog within
> a bpf_spin_lock critical section. This problem has been hit in sched-ext
> and ghOSt [0] as well, and is mostly an annoyance which is worked around
> by inling the static subprog into the critical section.
>
> In case of sched-ext, there are a lot of other helper/kfunc calls that
> need to be allow listed for the support to be complete, but a separate
> follow up will deal with that.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Allow calling static subprogs while holding a bpf_spin_lock
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a44b1334aadd
- [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for static subprog call in lock cs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e8699c4ff85b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-04 22:23 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Enable static subprog calls in spin lock critical sections Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-02-04 22:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Allow calling static subprogs while holding a bpf_spin_lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-02-04 22:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for static subprog call in lock cs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2024-02-05 22:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Enable static subprog calls in spin lock critical sections Barret Rhoden
2024-02-06 4:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170719202692.25774.2285679305015952977.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox