From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B0673199 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 04:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707192627; cv=none; b=aJVF7vPCKjfxWNhZf5glqwvY1de/AAuQcWl+4AlEwtngs2t4MqKOV1sVIGci5KWhVO+QX4k9CEp7RjDKi2IOD4Fu1anUdzYKpg2rHNa8iMo81vuBsAq1pPMY713waI+eqSsZxcMOklRmReC5iDSu75WTpgAlQTroNNzooCycaoo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707192627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=77/Ga4nbbBTrxzxafVQjPTEzpScRCO2UEMhJXlC9PWY=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=g64wnmYQg3g1o5l9dZ1RdYkbNFojFMKjYOvyRDMobPe9DBH06ixNX6Zp/0TSMd8qj/NdS8G3IhT/iPuSejwYsM/DyGTlhzsep9UP66LkgCu+uOlQpm1ZZWl9Dl83oc3VlXrNq8kGoqENCund/ohK0+M23HlEGjqslDCusO92zKo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=if/30gBx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="if/30gBx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BE4C43390; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 04:10:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707192626; bh=77/Ga4nbbBTrxzxafVQjPTEzpScRCO2UEMhJXlC9PWY=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=if/30gBxbRMzvl9sLfN8qxY/Azh7eDlrbSlDd7oihxIURgF6bs0JqMlPXODHALCPf E14/A1gf3jBHrCxpqCut/3MthdT6JLkq6eukgQrnoWXfnJpVD+ga+U6SH0rq16f/7c L6Pm7MLYtXvY/RGhaP93dQvKAhSiJl561tX2zR25z3P8ab+dKw2SrgsOTLKdzf+YWg 7t8CDGMucydC+OFcv2D4CMv6tVaVb+bwcoLhrPlciiFodSnwN5AO5VixHcYrUk5dn6 UvwxJcwaUUF0HEFdnIU7BBa+sT4mz5w5QuDYBOsBG6PVkxrSukyWI5WW2wJGmshxue zRJV4b4j5Waag== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C61EE2F2F9; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 04:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Transfer RCU lock state across subprog calls From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <170719262630.31872.2248639771567354367.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 04:10:26 +0000 References: <20240205055646.1112186-1-memxor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240205055646.1112186-1-memxor@gmail.com> To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, laoar.shao@gmail.com, void@manifault.com, tj@kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 05:56:44 +0000 you wrote: > David suggested during the discussion in [0] that we should handle RCU > locks in a similar fashion to spin locks where the verifier understands > when a lock held in a caller is released in callee, or lock taken in > callee is released in a caller, or the callee is called within a lock > critical section. This set extends the same semantics to RCU read locks > and adds a few selftests to verify correct behavior. This issue has also > come up for sched-ext programs. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Transfer RCU lock state between subprog calls https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6fceea0fa59f - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for RCU lock transfer between subprogs https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8be6a0147af3 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html