From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C408467 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707879631; cv=none; b=Mb7NwO0ASQXK6QkEGwHIMKK/po8fwAcPMgGhfJh09r6Z4yfrEKEGWgM2DnhRxXLAtv7lAPKbzYQIdONT6eCE44U0DViq6p7j67+xo1rVdCXr9YgniqNhbd2mPuPA9AxeXCe3GNwmakQHL3P7o0jjfyLTuOHJusQiqVfnyiEMOD8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707879631; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dYUwCy4oMibr9nvntCYv7YYJxXy4sqXv9NgSYenmT5g=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=sX46tDbGqU+DIWw/eWFAcjp4oSJXV83/lSL0JTckD5xNV+bKkkzm7/BAigKX4qc88eSkjuDhBG7N+PPRTbSCYOu37QgOzSAnIxlql1zErQmBYVqCN4iILk+DTOkrimVSMOBvjrBrsE/tx0XhIO9dA3iSPngeO5xZS/854mcHSmA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FV+y6E14; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FV+y6E14" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 502FAC43394; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:00:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707879630; bh=dYUwCy4oMibr9nvntCYv7YYJxXy4sqXv9NgSYenmT5g=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=FV+y6E14+hGeEN1Y0WQEW0VXappLohegc22t4rleEbaqAEuaV5wyFlhAWeEbMU/xz 7MOWNBN8tCOXhk1Xke8ZuGp2v4KxSkg9ASldydIdRPJXJkfgDfkR+TS9fC0k6j54D9 8mkuvnsrYuJOW9YOemafB+xke/uq2Q1Wlfh7fyCAcIXbj/4+maXajNCa/g5OilOpmM PDn6ZTatzUdrUC7z4SwBeDYe4m8cpqS/GaxZ38l3w0vD4hWcmrBG+j7V9DFUV9pZee zPWw8SJ2KG9MzKN8ujJCjlh8fNmYSfjj7RoTn7SZlsxgUoPoxyydwTURrmAItEImLy q1QUx+mMDyFdQ== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32882C1614E; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: emit source code file name and line number in verifier log From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <170787963020.17924.4049337524637501794.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:00:30 +0000 References: <20240212235944.2816107-1-andrii@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240212235944.2816107-1-andrii@kernel.org> To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:59:44 -0800 you wrote: > As BPF applications grow in size and complexity and are separated into > multiple .bpf.c files that are statically linked together, it becomes > harder and harder to match verifier's BPF assembly level output to > original C code. While often annotated C source code is unique enough to > be able to identify the file it belongs to, quite often this is actually > problematic as parts of source code can be quite generic. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,bpf-next] bpf: emit source code file name and line number in verifier log https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7cc13adbd057 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html