From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A82C7492 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718661632; cv=none; b=gyxq8gJ0Il8AGMopEy2QptWCOSFFKfUmKGdBqSZqGg/bRRR79KJ7HMvzCuPw9m/NH74INDUUz3uhSlSZSzXEOPlISCwbNk53SP6JLBjJe4JeYD2HHPHovba22Rg1M+ecvggA3yr+6MdFjWe4BV+R6y4KE6hG4POsrKhsy8h+8QY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718661632; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nS+kOL2lF4Njo2C3uqTZ36Xyrpf9ebX3cfPMHGdqJU4=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=H2ETXzyZ3YewRaLNVdbZXxRm+b8mwbAVmowA8X69Xw1zRzr6EzNeCPek2n0mlXAozOo8LmVjmrW5oeboGWBXEC2+OggIi6MIlIQ0IFIpzwTL6wJCuACv//oNtuXS3PSTwYbQl8gxtc9voETM6EQhZ6eAW2pvHwAHcUHNE1y8oVE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FdHoumG5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FdHoumG5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE8DC4AF1A; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:00:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718661631; bh=nS+kOL2lF4Njo2C3uqTZ36Xyrpf9ebX3cfPMHGdqJU4=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=FdHoumG5uesWaVLOAq0RaUdlM93rShkmslaXc6XjXr2I7HJEw+6nS6PHFQm4PvMbn rmPv4MM/qKI+WN5EyKcRm8BrrN0paP6SVTQkm9dp9mmJtBxkbyOa3myYKyzLdlwInT vxCdmRNp98yI8LarA+x66xE8z/VuGM+w0yFUWORYJWRFnH+jTeQq7R3XqM52Fod6ZS km8mbppK7H4xeHl2rX0+QTxjk5gps/5QCvB0ii5E9yEINfyZ81xcv9GJJ3a1qgaX9r sZVOtD4Y9veIfupkr8mMi5Tk6B/n1BU+xLbELOYTPEauiGrrAw/86AJp77h9hQQi0i byESEjj05ErTg== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCA9D2D0F8; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/9] bpf: support resilient split BTF From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <171866163144.18503.8187989801903069674.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:00:31 +0000 References: <20240613095014.357981-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20240613095014.357981-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com> To: Alan Maguire Cc: andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, dxu@dxuuu.xyz, bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko : On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:50:05 +0100 you wrote: > Split BPF Type Format (BTF) provides huge advantages in that kernel > modules only have to provide type information for types that they do not > share with the core kernel; for core kernel types, split BTF refers to > core kernel BTF type ids. So for a STRUCT sk_buff, a module that > uses that structure (or a pointer to it) simply needs to refer to the > core kernel type id, saving the need to define the structure and its many > dependents. This cuts down on duplication and makes BTF as compact > as possible. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v6,bpf-next,1/9] libbpf: add btf__distill_base() creating split BTF with distilled base BTF https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/58e185a0dc35 - [v6,bpf-next,2/9] selftests/bpf: test distilled base, split BTF generation https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/eb20e727c434 - [v6,bpf-next,3/9] libbpf: split BTF relocation https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/19e00c897d50 - [v6,bpf-next,4/9] selftests/bpf: extend distilled BTF tests to cover BTF relocation https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/affdeb50616b - [v6,bpf-next,5/9] libbpf: make btf_parse_elf process .BTF.base transparently https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c86f180ffc99 - [v6,bpf-next,6/9] resolve_btfids: handle presence of .BTF.base section https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6ba77385f386 - [v6,bpf-next,7/9] module, bpf: store BTF base pointer in struct module (no matching commit) - [v6,bpf-next,8/9] libbpf,bpf: share BTF relocate-related code with kernel (no matching commit) - [v6,bpf-next,9/9] kbuild,bpf: add module-specific pahole flags for distilled base BTF (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html