BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, billy@starlabs.sg,
	ramdhan@starlabs.sg, andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:10:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <171900063146.4429.1561366582593435770.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621140828.18238-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:08:27 +0200 you wrote:
> The BPF ring buffer internally is implemented as a power-of-2 sized circular
> buffer, with two logical and ever-increasing counters: consumer_pos is the
> consumer counter to show which logical position the consumer consumed the
> data, and producer_pos which is the producer counter denoting the amount of
> data reserved by all producers.
> 
> Each time a record is reserved, the producer that "owns" the record will
> successfully advance producer counter. In user space each time a record is
> read, the consumer of the data advanced the consumer counter once it finished
> processing. Both counters are stored in separate pages so that from user
> space, the producer counter is read-only and the consumer counter is read-write.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v3,1/2] bpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/cfa1a2329a69
  - [bpf,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more ring buffer test coverage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/1d68f685a850

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-21 14:08 [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf Daniel Borkmann
2024-06-21 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more ring buffer test coverage Daniel Borkmann
2024-06-21 20:04 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-21 20:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=171900063146.4429.1561366582593435770.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=billy@starlabs.sg \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ramdhan@starlabs.sg \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox