From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, deso@posteo.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix bpf_object__open_skeleton()'s mishandling of options
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:50:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172494663158.2000498.12444325129726377147.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240827203721.1145494-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:37:21 -0700 you wrote:
> We do an ugly copying of options in bpf_object__open_skeleton() just to
> be able to set object name from skeleton's recorded name (while still
> allowing user to override it through opts->object_name).
>
> This is not just ugly, but it also is broken due to memcpy() that
> doesn't take into account potential skel_opts' and user-provided opts'
> sizes differences due to backward and forward compatibility. This leads
> to copying over extra bytes and then failing to validate options
> properly. It could, technically, lead also to SIGSEGV, if we are unlucky.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] libbpf: fix bpf_object__open_skeleton()'s mishandling of options
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c634d6f4e12d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 20:37 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix bpf_object__open_skeleton()'s mishandling of options Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-28 17:28 ` Daniel Müller
2024-08-28 18:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-28 20:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-29 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172494663158.2000498.12444325129726377147.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deso@posteo.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox