From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, daniel@iogearbox.net,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, jolsa@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, thinker.li@gmail.com,
houtao1@huawei.com, xukuohai@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf RESEND 0/2] Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 23:50:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172851783075.1510884.4007844609326390404.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008071114.3718177-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:11:12 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch set adds the missed check again info_cnt when flattening the
> array of nested struct. The problem was spotted when developing dynptr
> key support for hash map. Patch #1 adds the missed check and patch #2
> adds three success test cases and one failure test case for the problem.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,RESEND,1/2] bpf: Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/797d73ee232d
- [bpf,RESEND,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more test case for field flattening
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/c456f0804058
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 7:11 [PATCH bpf RESEND 0/2] Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields Hou Tao
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH bpf RESEND 1/2] bpf: " Hou Tao
2024-10-09 6:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-10-09 7:12 ` Hou Tao
2024-10-09 7:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH bpf RESEND 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add more test case for field flattening Hou Tao
2024-10-09 7:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-10-09 23:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172851783075.1510884.4007844609326390404.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox