From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Fix libbpf's bpf_object and BPF subskel interoperability
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:20:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172974723848.1812236.15733569083629256183.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023043908.3834423-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:39:05 -0700 you wrote:
> Fix libbpf's global data map mmap()'ing logic to make BPF objects loaded
> through generic bpf_object__load() API interoperable with BPF subskeleton
> instantiated from such BPF object. The issue is in re-mmap()'ing of global
> data maps after BPF object is loaded into kernel, which is currently done in
> BPF skeleton-specific code, and should instead be done in generic and common
> bpf_object_load() logic.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/3] selftests/bpf: fix test_spin_lock_fail.c's global vars usage
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1b2bfc29695d
- [bpf-next,2/3] libbpf: move global data mmap()'ing into bpf_object__load()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/137978f42251
- [bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: validate generic bpf_object and subskel APIs work together
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/80a54566b7f0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 4:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Fix libbpf's bpf_object and BPF subskel interoperability Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 4:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: fix test_spin_lock_fail.c's global vars usage Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 4:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: move global data mmap()'ing into bpf_object__load() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 12:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-23 15:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 4:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: validate generic bpf_object and subskel APIs work together Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-24 5:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172974723848.1812236.15733569083629256183.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox