public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] virtio_ring: split: record extras for indirect buffers
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:51:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1730789499.0809722-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtP7tdxxLOtDArNCqO5b=A=a7X2NimK8be2aWuaKG6Xfw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:42:09 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:25 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > The subsequent commit needs to know whether every indirect buffer is
> > premapped or not. So we need to introduce an extra struct for every
> > indirect buffer to record this info.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> Do we have a performance impact for this patch?
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 97590c201aa2..dca093744fe1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -69,7 +69,11 @@
> >
> >  struct vring_desc_state_split {
> >         void *data;                     /* Data for callback. */
> > -       struct vring_desc *indir_desc;  /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> > +
> > +       /* Indirect extra table and desc table, if any. These two will be
> > +        * allocated together. So we won't stress more to the memory allocator.
> > +        */
> > +       struct vring_desc *indir_desc;
>
> So it looks like we put a descriptor table after the extra table. Can
> this lead to more crossing page mappings for the indirect descriptors?
>
> If yes, it seems expensive so we probably need to make the descriptor
> table come first.

No, the descriptors are before extra table.
So, there is not performance impact.


>
> >  };
> >
> >  struct vring_desc_state_packed {
> > @@ -440,38 +444,20 @@ static void virtqueue_init(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, u32 num)
> >   * Split ring specific functions - *_split().
> >   */
> >
> > -static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > -                                          const struct vring_desc *desc)
> > -{
> > -       u16 flags;
> > -
> > -       if (!vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq))
> > -               return;
> > -
> > -       flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->flags);
> > -
> > -       dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > -                      virtio64_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->addr),
> > -                      virtio32_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->len),
> > -                      (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> > -                      DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > -                                         unsigned int i)
> > +                                         struct vring_desc_extra *extra)
> >  {
> > -       struct vring_desc_extra *extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
> >         u16 flags;
> >
> > -       flags = extra[i].flags;
> > +       flags = extra->flags;
> >
> >         if (flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> >                 if (!vq->use_dma_api)
> >                         goto out;
> >
> >                 dma_unmap_single(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > -                                extra[i].addr,
> > -                                extra[i].len,
> > +                                extra->addr,
> > +                                extra->len,
> >                                  (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> >                                  DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >         } else {
> > @@ -479,22 +465,23 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >                         goto out;
> >
> >                 dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> > -                              extra[i].addr,
> > -                              extra[i].len,
> > +                              extra->addr,
> > +                              extra->len,
> >                                (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> >                                DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >         }
> >
> >  out:
> > -       return extra[i].next;
> > +       return extra->next;
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                                                unsigned int total_sg,
> >                                                gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> > +       struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> >         struct vring_desc *desc;
> > -       unsigned int i;
> > +       unsigned int i, size;
> >
> >         /*
> >          * We require lowmem mappings for the descriptors because
> > @@ -503,40 +490,41 @@ static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >          */
> >         gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
> >
> > -       desc = kmalloc_array(total_sg, sizeof(struct vring_desc), gfp);
> > +       size = sizeof(*desc) * total_sg + sizeof(*extra) * total_sg;
> > +
> > +       desc = kmalloc(size, gfp);
> >         if (!desc)
> >                 return NULL;
> >
> > +       extra = (struct vring_desc_extra *)&desc[total_sg];
> > +
> >         for (i = 0; i < total_sg; i++)
> > -               desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, i + 1);
> > +               extra[i].next = i + 1;
> > +
> >         return desc;
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline unsigned int virtqueue_add_desc_split(struct virtqueue *vq,
> >                                                     struct vring_desc *desc,
> > +                                                   struct vring_desc_extra *extra,
> >                                                     unsigned int i,
> >                                                     dma_addr_t addr,
> >                                                     unsigned int len,
> > -                                                   u16 flags,
> > -                                                   bool indirect)
> > +                                                   u16 flags)
> >  {
> > -       struct vring_virtqueue *vring = to_vvq(vq);
> > -       struct vring_desc_extra *extra = vring->split.desc_extra;
> >         u16 next;
> >
> >         desc[i].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vdev, flags);
> >         desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(vq->vdev, addr);
> >         desc[i].len = cpu_to_virtio32(vq->vdev, len);
> >
> > -       if (!indirect) {
> > -               next = extra[i].next;
> > -               desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vdev, next);
> > +       extra[i].addr = addr;
> > +       extra[i].len = len;
> > +       extra[i].flags = flags;
> > +
> > +       next = extra[i].next;
> >
> > -               extra[i].addr = addr;
> > -               extra[i].len = len;
> > -               extra[i].flags = flags;
> > -       } else
> > -               next = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vdev, desc[i].next);
> > +       desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vdev, next);
> >
> >         return next;
> >  }
> > @@ -551,6 +539,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                                       gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> >         struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +       struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> >         struct scatterlist *sg;
> >         struct vring_desc *desc;
> >         unsigned int i, n, avail, descs_used, prev, err_idx;
> > @@ -586,9 +575,11 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                 /* Set up rest to use this indirect table. */
> >                 i = 0;
> >                 descs_used = 1;
> > +               extra = (struct vring_desc_extra *)&desc[total_sg];
> >         } else {
> >                 indirect = false;
> >                 desc = vq->split.vring.desc;
> > +               extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
> >                 i = head;
> >                 descs_used = total_sg;
> >         }
> > @@ -618,9 +609,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                         /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> >                          * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> >                          */
> > -                       i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, i, addr, sg->length,
> > -                                                    VRING_DESC_F_NEXT,
> > -                                                    indirect);
> > +                       i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, extra, i, addr, sg->length,
> > +                                                    VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> >                 }
> >         }
> >         for (; n < (out_sgs + in_sgs); n++) {
> > @@ -634,11 +624,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                         /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> >                          * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> >                          */
> > -                       i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, i, addr,
> > +                       i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, extra, i, addr,
> >                                                      sg->length,
> >                                                      VRING_DESC_F_NEXT |
> > -                                                    VRING_DESC_F_WRITE,
> > -                                                    indirect);
> > +                                                    VRING_DESC_F_WRITE);
> >                 }
> >         }
> >         /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> > @@ -660,10 +649,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                 }
> >
> >                 virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, vq->split.vring.desc,
> > +                                        vq->split.desc_extra,
> >                                          head, addr,
> >                                          total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc),
> > -                                        VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT,
> > -                                        false);
> > +                                        VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT);
> >         }
> >
> >         /* We're using some buffers from the free list. */
> > @@ -716,11 +705,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >         for (n = 0; n < total_sg; n++) {
> >                 if (i == err_idx)
> >                         break;
> > -               if (indirect) {
> > -                       vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &desc[i]);
> > -                       i = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, desc[i].next);
> > -               } else
> > -                       i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
> > +
> > +               i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
> >         }
> >
> >  free_indirect:
> > @@ -765,22 +751,25 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >  static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> >                              void **ctx)
> >  {
> > +       struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> >         unsigned int i, j;
> >         __virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> >
> >         /* Clear data ptr. */
> >         vq->split.desc_state[head].data = NULL;
> >
> > +       extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
> > +
> >         /* Put back on free list: unmap first-level descriptors and find end */
> >         i = head;
> >
> >         while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
> > -               vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
> > +               vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
>
> Not sure if I've asked this before. But this part seems to deserve an
> independent fix for -stable.

What fix?

Thanks.

>
> >                 i = vq->split.desc_extra[i].next;
> >                 vq->vq.num_free++;
> >         }
> >
> > -       vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
> > +       vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
> >         vq->split.desc_extra[i].next = vq->free_head;
> >         vq->free_head = head;
> >
> > @@ -790,21 +779,24 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> >         if (vq->indirect) {
> >                 struct vring_desc *indir_desc =
> >                                 vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
> > -               u32 len;
> > +               u32 len, num;
> >
> >                 /* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> >                 if (!indir_desc)
> >                         return;
> > -
> >                 len = vq->split.desc_extra[head].len;
> >
> >                 BUG_ON(!(vq->split.desc_extra[head].flags &
> >                                 VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT));
> >                 BUG_ON(len == 0 || len % sizeof(struct vring_desc));
> >
> > +               num = len / sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> > +
> > +               extra = (struct vring_desc_extra *)&indir_desc[num];
> > +
> >                 if (vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq)) {
> > -                       for (j = 0; j < len / sizeof(struct vring_desc); j++)
> > -                               vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &indir_desc[j]);
> > +                       for (j = 0; j < num; j++)
> > +                               vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[j]);
> >                 }
> >
> >                 kfree(indir_desc);
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
>
> Thanks
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-30  8:24 [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] virtio-net: support AF_XDP zero copy (tx) Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] virtio_ring: introduce vring_need_unmap_buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] virtio_ring: split: record extras for indirect buffers Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-05  3:42   ` Jason Wang
2024-11-05  6:51     ` Xuan Zhuo [this message]
2024-11-06  1:44       ` Jason Wang
2024-11-06  5:58         ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-06  7:42         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-11-11  1:27           ` Jason Wang
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/13] virtio_ring: packed: " Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/13] virtio_ring: perform premapped operations based on per-buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-05  4:25   ` Jason Wang
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/13] virtio_ring: introduce add api for premapped Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-31  2:19   ` kernel test robot
2024-11-05  4:28   ` Jason Wang
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] virtio-net: rq submits premapped per-buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-05  3:23   ` Jason Wang
2024-11-05  7:09     ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-06  1:56       ` Jason Wang
2024-11-06  5:55         ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] virtio_ring: remove API virtqueue_set_dma_premapped Xuan Zhuo
2024-11-05  4:29   ` Jason Wang
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] virtio_net: refactor the xmit type Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] virtio_net: xsk: bind/unbind xsk for tx Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/13] virtio_net: xsk: prevent disable tx napi Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] virtio_net: xsk: tx: support xmit xsk buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/13] virtio_net: update tx timeout record Xuan Zhuo
2024-10-30  8:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/13] virtio_net: xdp_features add NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY Xuan Zhuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1730789499.0809722-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox