From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fix a few issues in arena_spin_lock
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:10:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174553983700.3526942.13762326617930238465.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424165525.154403-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:41:24 +0200 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried running the arena_spin_lock test on s390x and ran into the
> following issues:
>
> * Changing the header file does not lead to rebuilding the test.
> * The checked for number of CPUs and the actually required number of
> CPUs are different.
> * Endianness issue in spinlock definition.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock.c build dependency
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6fdc754b922b
- [2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock on systems with less than 16 CPUs
(no matching commit)
- [3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in __qspinlock declaration
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 16:41 [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fix a few issues in arena_spin_lock Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-04-24 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock.c build dependency Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-04-24 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock on systems with less than 16 CPUs Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-04-24 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in __qspinlock declaration Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-04-24 18:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fix a few issues in arena_spin_lock patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-04-24 18:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-24 18:51 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-04-25 16:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-25 17:18 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-04-25 18:58 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-04-26 0:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-25 0:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2025-04-25 0:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-25 0:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-04-25 1:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174553983700.3526942.13762326617930238465.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox