BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	kuniyu@amazon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it, paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it,
	ahabdels.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 01:10:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174614824249.3123530.9494554975799967680.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429132453.31605-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:24:53 +0200 you wrote:
> Recent updates to the locking mechanism that protects IPv6 routing tables
> [1] have affected the SRv6 networking subsystem. Such changes cause
> problems with some SRv6 Endpoints behaviors, like End.B6.Encaps and also
> impact SRv6 counters.
> 
> Starting from commit 169fd62799e8 ("ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCADDRT and
> RTM_NEWROUTE."), the inet6_rtm_newroute() function no longer needs to
> acquire the RTNL lock for creating and configuring IPv6 routes and set up
> lwtunnels.
> The RTNL lock can be avoided because the ip6_route_add() function
> finishes setting up a new route in a section protected by RCU.
> This makes sure that no dev/nexthops can disappear during the operation.
> Because of this, the steps for setting up lwtunnels - i.e., calling
> lwtunnel_build_state() - are now done in a RCU lock section and not
> under the RTNL lock anymore.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/14a0087e7236

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-02  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 13:24 [net-next] ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup Andrea Mayer
2025-04-29 15:22 ` David Ahern
2025-05-02  1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174614824249.3123530.9494554975799967680.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=ahabdels.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox