From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B400C1DDA34 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 02:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751596819; cv=none; b=j95ejlmQoWsNPEiHwPLECOfIC0XOig+B7UVGbNWK5Cv7Bzq5tlsbgfZzaei/Ail5S8sWSquoZjcFkMMj7XLZPGJalZ2Veexg0RwvRzrmkdFmvHtoVnWr2ukJVjfKlfxHYca1XbM2p4qD1aW6nZSVlxjOJnAv9PabPFpOc9/dMm4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751596819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d64e7tVqdgMTKnVI9lPkoxIPYp275S47KOOQNSx+Z0c=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=lPgJQTxQNnYSLWa3eHSbCoCB3+vHYvJBkEMPXXvSKDJ8xQOQ8LejKmMqFVT3/6VIPiykqk/XFl/bJ0pB6glYtyQ2Ak3UasENUVHwzUT9SPMfgytJfOHTBxunFCAqmdXTkerX3/yiH8o3OXRWM3ydqJrA9/vHcVEpsuXKBZuJuxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DHjJqLsz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DHjJqLsz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51BBFC4CEF0; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 02:40:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751596816; bh=d64e7tVqdgMTKnVI9lPkoxIPYp275S47KOOQNSx+Z0c=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=DHjJqLszpVntNcRjCLZRUjeUAvWeNKVpJ+YWuQhgNAWN9LpWGjEy62m+b9C9Z1sAx DpClTGxGznFapKoPGrYpz7XcCUEErZdi+GY3yWwdoNeQMCw/vJeGHAOrGMpTsFm5jR Qi9zAhM98J6NRWOLIposV+wvWoX1jr40RG7tHpguushZGDy/tSgqpGAQUfw/XPAY+A Pieco5aa7wQItipmfHBZF0pQ7qGxU1yWZert6WjupJoBfdRSNRvGTqKELlx/BvRlTr sjk2V9dvnjNesYLRqfkUKW9UTB4wWAhA1Z9/JrnSoUuSXMJVsTGWKYGt0OXwGP4uF2 it7sv9Ga3Yg8Q== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC59383BA01; Fri, 4 Jul 2025 02:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Avoid warning on unexpected map for tail call From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <175159684049.1682876.6755694378907316920.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 02:40:40 +0000 References: <1f395b74e73022e47e04a31735f258babf305420.1751578055.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1f395b74e73022e47e04a31735f258babf305420.1751578055.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com> To: Paul Chaignon Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 23:35:09 +0200 you wrote: > Before handling the tail call in record_func_key(), we check that the > map is of the expected type and log a verifier error if it isn't. Such > an error however doesn't indicate anything wrong with the verifier. The > check for map<>func compatibility is done after record_func_key(), by > check_map_func_compatibility(). > > Therefore, this patch logs the error as a typical reject instead of a > verifier error. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Avoid warning on unexpected map for tail call https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/032547272eb0 - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Negative test case for tail call map (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html