BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Improve 64bits bounds refinement
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:10:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175372261425.782645.17863794939852326898.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1753695655.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:50:01 +0200 you wrote:
> This patchset improves the 64bits bounds refinement when the s64 ranges
> crosses the sign boundary. The first patch explains the small addition
> to __reg64_deduce_bounds. The last one explains why we need a third
> round of __reg_deduce_bounds. The third patch adds a selftest with a
> more complete example of the impact on verification. The second and
> fourth patches update the existing selftests to take the new refinement
> into account.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/5] bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/00bf8d0c6c9b
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/5] selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/da653de268d3
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/5] selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/26e5e346a52c
  - [bpf-next,v4,4/5] selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f96841bbf4a1
  - [bpf-next,v4,5/5] bpf: Add third round of bounds deduction
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5dbb19b16ac4

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-28 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-28  9:50 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Improve 64bits bounds refinement Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28  9:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28  9:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] selftests/bpf: Update reg_bound range refinement logic Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28  9:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28  9:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/5] selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28  9:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] bpf: Add third round of bounds deduction Paul Chaignon
2025-07-28 17:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175372261425.782645.17863794939852326898.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
    --cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox