* [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Replace get_next_cpu() with cpumask_next_wrap()
@ 2025-08-18 3:23 Fushuai Wang
2025-08-18 13:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fushuai Wang @ 2025-08-18 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, bpf, martin.lau, ast, daniel, andrii
Cc: eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf,
haoluo, jolsa, Fushuai Wang
The get_next_cpu() function was only used in one place to find
the next possible CPU, which can be replaced by cpumask_next_wrap().
Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
index 2d6e1c98d8ad..e7a2fc60523f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c
@@ -19,14 +19,6 @@
#define LOCAL_PENDING_LIST_IDX LOCAL_LIST_IDX(BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_PENDING)
#define IS_LOCAL_LIST_TYPE(t) ((t) >= BPF_LOCAL_LIST_T_OFFSET)
-static int get_next_cpu(int cpu)
-{
- cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
- if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask);
- return cpu;
-}
-
/* Local list helpers */
static struct list_head *local_free_list(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l)
{
@@ -482,7 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_common_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&steal_loc_l->lock, flags);
- steal = get_next_cpu(steal);
+ steal = cpumask_next_wrap(steal, cpu_possible_mask);
} while (!node && steal != first_steal);
loc_l->next_steal = steal;
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Replace get_next_cpu() with cpumask_next_wrap()
2025-08-18 3:23 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Replace get_next_cpu() with cpumask_next_wrap() Fushuai Wang
@ 2025-08-18 13:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-08-18 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fushuai Wang
Cc: linux-kernel, bpf, martin.lau, ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, song,
yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:23:44 +0800 you wrote:
> The get_next_cpu() function was only used in one place to find
> the next possible CPU, which can be replaced by cpumask_next_wrap().
>
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2] bpf: Replace get_next_cpu() with cpumask_next_wrap()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d87fdb1f27d7
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-18 13:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-18 3:23 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Replace get_next_cpu() with cpumask_next_wrap() Fushuai Wang
2025-08-18 13:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).