From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C519E29408 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 18:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761244232; cv=none; b=aX1nWuJ6Dqrhi2l7yxptGjE0ijIzjOY7/ebSj7OLiIAh+g+nRNdJ7TEFO61/Ki/3XYdudfboUxmxolbFLCaZuquWLf33oex2pkX4hp9NXq549ARxMIvzBsUuR6JASLviT0hzvz6DNXlsJf6MXVyl7CCSULJrhYzc/NxThSXimB8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761244232; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qVT2cHheyYCRZKDG9x8WDTGNLQBDe+aap/cTJ8W5B3w=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=d/LevjqhUfLrH69VWSOBTPyo0wOrYbMeNlMjAdDjDkuV0hEzc2G2GfDFGzXGHbIdzdCcpPS50rqPECqE06R2488MzwGWfu/f2QU8oQspme83KXJQkbVaSf+9eM4zg/xo1GyaZVYhGUqyIsbEPWEpKnnjfrmM22oVtPuv9CKt4dc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Wf6/1x6M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Wf6/1x6M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 606A0C4CEE7; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 18:30:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761244232; bh=qVT2cHheyYCRZKDG9x8WDTGNLQBDe+aap/cTJ8W5B3w=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=Wf6/1x6Mzyo1Oz8tuUGTqlu5TPkIquoMMDpWVIklkFRyYgxPmYVLs+B+ZuKdrJ6eD 4szv49SN+jNj4O7F8fSdUw7W7Y6gavdAnhPO5CLVKa/qB9HhnMwr4mXeT1TCcdmBPz GWgtWM/Vdmv8pe1NDKsODoNEJug43N/Nei0TA5MDdtIAKV+GR9kCpDTP9YSVSRTcYK vWagcAhPVbkTQY6J1wzxHzcR7NSBya1zkCr0JpQ/JejuePWz5SszvRM/bigAABVsB4 2PU2Q5jlsHEc19P+cpBxof8WoOKGWiMcLdLnmrrHppy+20uQUGJuOpFIDNBzJmi/fu eH4wIB323MB9Q== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEED380A956; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 18:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix powerpc's stack register definition in bpf_tracing.h From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <176124421252.3200573.3750075512025000623.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 18:30:12 +0000 References: <20251020203643.989467-1-andrii@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251020203643.989467-1-andrii@kernel.org> To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, naveen@kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:36:43 -0700 you wrote: > retsnoop's build on powerpc (ppc64le) architecture ([0]) failed due to > wrong definition of PT_REGS_SP() macro. Looking at powerpc's > implementation of stack unwinding in perf_callchain_user_64() clearly > shows that stack pointer register is gpr[1]. > > Fix libbpf's definition of __PT_SP_REG for powerpc to fix all this. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] libbpf: fix powerpc's stack register definition in bpf_tracing.h https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/7221b9caf84b You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html