[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv

[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv

[Menglong Dong]

Implement bpf fsession for the riscv architecture.

Changes v4 -> v3:
* fix the build error
* v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206122002.1494125-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/

Changes v3 -> v2:
* fix some comments.
* v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206115823.1070354-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/T/#t

Changes v2 -> v1:
* use bpf_prog_calls_session_cookie() in invoke_bpf() in the 2nd patch.
* v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260203055231.1088479-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/

Menglong Dong (3):
  bpf, riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline
  bpf, riscv: add fsession support for trampolines
  selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64

 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c               | 97 +++++++++++++++----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c  |  2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c    |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf, riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline

[Menglong Dong]

Introduce a helper to store 64-bit immediate on the trampoline stack with
a help of a register.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 37888abee70c..e4f45e2e7e2f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -926,6 +926,14 @@ static void restore_stack_args(int nr_stack_args, int args_off, int stk_arg_off,
 	}
 }
 
+static void emit_store_stack_imm64(u8 reg, int stack_off, u64 imm64,
+				   struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+{
+	/* Load imm64 into reg and store it at [FP + stack_off]. */
+	emit_imm(reg, (s64)imm64, ctx);
+	emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, stack_off, reg, ctx);
+}
+
 static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_off,
 			   int run_ctx_off, bool save_ret, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
@@ -933,12 +941,10 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_of
 	struct bpf_prog *p = l->link.prog;
 	int cookie_off = offsetof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx, bpf_cookie);
 
-	if (l->cookie) {
-		emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, l->cookie, ctx);
-		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -run_ctx_off + cookie_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
-	} else {
+	if (l->cookie)
+		emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -run_ctx_off + cookie_off, l->cookie, ctx);
+	else
 		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -run_ctx_off + cookie_off, RV_REG_ZERO, ctx);
-	}
 
 	/* arg1: prog */
 	emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, (const s64)p, ctx);
@@ -1123,13 +1129,10 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -sreg_off, RV_REG_S1, ctx);
 
 	/* store ip address of the traced function */
-	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG) {
-		emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, (const s64)func_addr, ctx);
-		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -ip_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
-	}
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG)
+		emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -ip_off, (u64)func_addr, ctx);
 
-	emit_li(RV_REG_T1, nr_arg_slots, ctx);
-	emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -nregs_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
+	emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -nregs_off, nr_arg_slots, ctx);
 
 	store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
 
-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf, riscv: add fsession support for trampolines

[Menglong Dong]

Implement BPF_TRACE_FSESSION support in the RISC-V trampoline JIT. The
logic here is similar to what we did in x86_64.

In order to simply the logic, we factor out the function invoke_bpf() for
fentry and fexit.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
---
v4:
- fix the build error

v3:
- remove the "always" from the comment

v2:
- use bpf_prog_calls_session_cookie() in invoke_bpf()
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index e4f45e2e7e2f..f065b45e8d8f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -996,6 +996,29 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_of
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int invoke_bpf(struct bpf_tramp_links *tl, int args_off, int retval_off,
+		      int run_ctx_off, int func_meta_off, bool save_ret, u64 func_meta,
+		      int cookie_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+{
+	int i, cur_cookie = (cookie_off - args_off) / 8;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < tl->nr_links; i++) {
+		int err;
+
+		if (bpf_prog_calls_session_cookie(tl->links[i])) {
+			u64 meta = func_meta | ((u64)cur_cookie << BPF_TRAMP_COOKIE_INDEX_SHIFT);
+
+			emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -func_meta_off, meta, ctx);
+			cur_cookie--;
+		}
+		err = invoke_bpf_prog(tl->links[i], args_off, retval_off, run_ctx_off,
+				      save_ret, ctx);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 					 const struct btf_func_model *m,
 					 struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
@@ -1005,13 +1028,15 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	int i, ret, offset;
 	int *branches_off = NULL;
 	int stack_size = 0, nr_arg_slots = 0;
-	int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off, stk_arg_off;
+	int retval_off, args_off, func_meta_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off, stk_arg_off;
+	int cookie_off, cookie_cnt;
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
 	struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
 	bool is_struct_ops = flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT;
 	void *orig_call = func_addr;
 	bool save_ret;
+	u64 func_meta;
 	u32 insn;
 
 	/* Two types of generated trampoline stack layout:
@@ -1042,10 +1067,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	 *                  [ ...               ]
 	 * FP - args_off    [ arg1              ]
 	 *
-	 * FP - nregs_off   [ regs count        ]
+	 * FP - func_meta_off [ regs count, etc ]
 	 *
 	 * FP - ip_off      [ traced func	] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG
 	 *
+	 *                  [ stack cookie N    ]
+	 *                  [ ...               ]
+	 * FP - cookie_off  [ stack cookie 1    ]
+	 *
 	 * FP - run_ctx_off [ bpf_tramp_run_ctx ]
 	 *
 	 * FP - sreg_off    [ callee saved reg	]
@@ -1077,14 +1106,20 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
 	args_off = stack_size;
 
+	/* function metadata, such as regs count */
 	stack_size += 8;
-	nregs_off = stack_size;
+	func_meta_off = stack_size;
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG) {
 		stack_size += 8;
 		ip_off = stack_size;
 	}
 
+	cookie_cnt = bpf_fsession_cookie_cnt(tlinks);
+	/* room for session cookies */
+	stack_size += cookie_cnt * 8;
+	cookie_off = stack_size;
+
 	stack_size += round_up(sizeof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx), 8);
 	run_ctx_off = stack_size;
 
@@ -1132,10 +1167,19 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG)
 		emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -ip_off, (u64)func_addr, ctx);
 
-	emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -nregs_off, nr_arg_slots, ctx);
+	func_meta = nr_arg_slots;
+	emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -func_meta_off, func_meta, ctx);
 
 	store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
 
+	if (bpf_fsession_cnt(tlinks)) {
+		/* clear all session cookies' value */
+		for (i = 0; i < cookie_cnt; i++)
+			emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -cookie_off + 8 * i, RV_REG_ZERO, ctx);
+		/* clear return value to make sure fentry always get 0 */
+		emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -retval_off, RV_REG_ZERO, ctx);
+	}
+
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, ctx->insns ? (const s64)im : RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM, ctx);
 		ret = emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, true, ctx);
@@ -1143,9 +1187,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < fentry->nr_links; i++) {
-		ret = invoke_bpf_prog(fentry->links[i], args_off, retval_off, run_ctx_off,
-				      flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET, ctx);
+	if (fentry->nr_links) {
+		ret = invoke_bpf(fentry, args_off, retval_off, run_ctx_off, func_meta_off,
+				 flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET, func_meta, cookie_off, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1192,9 +1236,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 		*(u32 *)(ctx->insns + branches_off[i]) = insn;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < fexit->nr_links; i++) {
-		ret = invoke_bpf_prog(fexit->links[i], args_off, retval_off,
-				      run_ctx_off, false, ctx);
+	/* set "is_return" flag for fsession */
+	func_meta |= (1ULL << BPF_TRAMP_IS_RETURN_SHIFT);
+	if (bpf_fsession_cnt(tlinks))
+		emit_store_stack_imm64(RV_REG_T1, -func_meta_off, func_meta, ctx);
+
+	if (fexit->nr_links) {
+		ret = invoke_bpf(fexit, args_off, retval_off, run_ctx_off, func_meta_off,
+				 false, func_meta, cookie_off, ctx);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 	}
@@ -2094,3 +2143,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(s32 imm)
 		return false;
 	}
 }
+
+bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
+{
+	return true;
+}
-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64

[Menglong Dong]

Now that the RISC-V trampoline JIT supports BPF_TRACE_FSESSION, run
the fsession selftest on riscv64 as well as x86_64.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c
index 180ba5098ca1..075a1180ec26 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(tp_test2)
 }
 
 __u64 test7_result = 0;
-#if defined(bpf_target_x86) || defined(bpf_target_arm64)
+#if defined(bpf_target_x86) || defined(bpf_target_arm64) || defined(bpf_target_riscv)
 SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
 int BPF_PROG(test7)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index 43ff836a8ed8..45eaa54d1ac7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int BPF_URETPROBE(test8, int ret)
 
 __u64 test9_entry_result = 0;
 __u64 test9_exit_result = 0;
-#if defined(bpf_target_x86) || defined(bpf_target_arm64)
+#if defined(bpf_target_x86) || defined(bpf_target_arm64) || defined(bpf_target_riscv)
 SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
 int BPF_PROG(test9, int a)
 {
-- 
2.53.0

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv

[Pu Lehui]

On 2026/2/8 13:33, Menglong Dong wrote:
> Implement bpf fsession for the riscv architecture.
> 
> Changes v4 -> v3:
> * fix the build error
> * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206122002.1494125-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
> 
> Changes v3 -> v2:
> * fix some comments.
> * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206115823.1070354-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/T/#t
> 
> Changes v2 -> v1:
> * use bpf_prog_calls_session_cookie() in invoke_bpf() in the 2nd patch.
> * v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260203055231.1088479-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
> 
> Menglong Dong (3):
>    bpf, riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline
>    bpf, riscv: add fsession support for trampolines
>    selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64
> 
>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c               | 97 +++++++++++++++----
>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_args_test.c  |  2 +-
>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c    |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 

looks good to me, feel free to add

Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Sun,  8 Feb 2026 13:33:08 +0800 you wrote:
> Implement bpf fsession for the riscv architecture.
> 
> Changes v4 -> v3:
> * fix the build error
> * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206122002.1494125-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
> 
> Changes v3 -> v2:
> * fix some comments.
> * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206115823.1070354-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/T/#t
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/3] bpf, riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/63ad3d614241
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/3] bpf, riscv: add fsession support for trampolines
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/2277c14bc90b
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/3] selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/5749b6532b4c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Sun,  8 Feb 2026 13:33:08 +0800 you wrote:
> Implement bpf fsession for the riscv architecture.
> 
> Changes v4 -> v3:
> * fix the build error
> * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206122002.1494125-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/
> 
> Changes v3 -> v2:
> * fix some comments.
> * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260206115823.1070354-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/T/#t
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v4,1/3] bpf, riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/93fd420d71be
  - [bpf-next,v4,2/3] bpf, riscv: add fsession support for trampolines
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/35b3515be0ec
  - [bpf-next,v4,3/3] selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html